The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Behavioral Ecology and Climate Change during the Transition to Agriculture in Valencia, Eastern Spain
Abstract
Using the behavioral ecological model of ideal free distribution (IFD), McClure, Jochim, and Barton (2006) identified the tight linkage between agricultural subsistence strategies, herd management, and long-term dynamics of human land use. Missing from their discussion, however, was placing these changes into a broader environmental context. The IFD provides a useful heuristic device to illustrate cost-benefit decisions within a spatial context. This paper compares the previous interpretations of land use during the Neolithic with climatic data from the Holocene. Two main arid periods have been identified during the early and middle Holocene that correspond chronologically to Neolithic cultural horizons. Climate models recently generated for the area further suggest shifts in precipitation cycles may have exacerbated the impacts of broader climatic fluctuations on agricultural production.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
McClure, Jochim, and Barton (2006) employed the IFD (with and without Allee effects) to understand how climate change drove agricultural intensification which reduced the suitability of agricultural land in Neolithic Spain, leading people to move to new habitats and adopt new technologies.
“McClure, Jochim, and Barton (2006) employed the IFD (with and without Allee effects) to understand how climate change drove agricultural intensification which reduced the suitability of agricultural land in Neolithic Spain, leading people to move to new habitats and adopt new technologies (McClure, Barton, and Jochim 2009).”
From The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning (2022) · cites this paper as McClure, Barton, and Jochim 2009
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning
Weitzel, E. M., & Codding, B. F. (2022) · Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.1080/14614103.2020.1803015 · Cited by 49
Davis, D. S., Andriankaja, V., Carnat, T. L., Chrisostome, Z. M., Colombe, C., Fenomanana, F., Hubertine, L., Justome, R., Lahiniriko, F., Léonce, H., et al. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105097 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- McClure, S. B., Barton, C. M., & Jochim, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Anthropological Research
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-269
- ISSN
- 0091-7710
- 2153-3806
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review