Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service
Abstract
Whether on a patrol beat, in social service offices, or in public school classrooms, street-level workers continually confront rules in relation to their own beliefs about the people they encounter. Cops, Teachers, Counselors is the first major study of street-level bureaucracy to rely on storytelling. Steven Maynard-Moody and Michael Musheno collect the stories told by these workers in order to analyze the ways that they ascribe identities to the people they encounter and use these identities to account for their own decisions and actions. The authors show us how the world of street-level work is defined by the competing tensions of law abidance and cultural abidance in a unique study that finally allows cops, teachers, and counselors to voice their own views of their work. Steven Maynard-Moody is Director of the Policy Research Institute and Professor of Public Administration at the University of Kansas. Michael Musheno is Professor of Justice and Policy Studies at Lycoming College and Professor Emeritus of Justice Studies, Arizona State University.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Practitioners' beliefs and moral values are important factors in street-level decision-making.
“Practitioner's beliefs and moral values are important factors in regard to how street-level decision-making unfolds [77,83,105].”
From A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare (2021) · cites this paper as [83]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature
Tummers, L. L. G., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Self-citationChristensen, J., Aarøe, L., Baekgaard, M., Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13134 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
“Such negative categorizations make it easier for state actors to rationalize imposing burdens and maintaining rules and requirements that they might otherwise relax for someone they perceive to be trying harder (Maynard-Moody and Musheno 2003).”
BackgroundDeciding to discipline: Race, choice, and punishment at the frontlines of welfare reform.
Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Houser, L. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400304 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Loyens, K., & Maesschalck, J. (2010) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399710362524 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
"We Would Never Write That Down": Classifications of Unemployed and Data Challenges for AI
Petersen, A. C. M., Christensen, L. R., Harper, R., & Hildebrandt, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449176 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic Decisions
Lyons, H., Velloso, E., & Miller, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449180 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M.
- ORCID
- Musheno, Michael
- Venue
- University of Michigan Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Michigan Press
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W2344389135
- Cited by
- 1,165
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Michigan Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- street-level bureaucracy, police officers, teachers, school counselors, decision-making, social control, storytelling, public service work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review