The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental Foundations of Political Science
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review
Innvær, S., Vist, G., Trommald, M., & Oxman, A. (2002) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/135581902320432778 · Cited by 1,006
Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?
BARABAS, J., & JERIT, J. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000092 · Cited by 481
Deciding to discipline: Race, choice, and punishment at the frontlines of welfare reform.
Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Houser, L. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400304 · Cited by 399
A TASTE FOR PUNISHMENT: Black and White Americans' Views on the Death Penalty and the War on Drugs
Bobo, L. D., & Johnson, D. (2004) · Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x04040081 · Cited by 353
Bay, A.-H., & Pedersen, A. W. (2006) · Acta Sociologica · doi:10.1177/0001699306071682 · Cited by 108
No Place to Rest: African American Political Attitudes and the Myth of Black Women's Strength
Harris-Lacewell, M. (2001) · Women & Politics · doi:10.1300/j014v23n03_01 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Venue
- University of Michigan Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Michigan Press
- Published
- 1993
- OpenAlex
- W1558298601
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.