The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences
Open accessAbstract
In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences eleven scholars widely known for their interdisciplinary work investigate one of the most striking developments in the intellectual world today: the return to history by a wide range of academic disciplines. From "new historicism" in literary theory, to "ethnohistory," to "historical sociology," these new approaches have resulted both in more works of historical analysis and in a more self-conscious attempt to locate the human sciences in their own histories. The essays in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences -- eight of them published here for the first time -- take stock of these changes from the perspectives of some of the disciplines most deeply involved: anthropology, sociology, political science, law, literary studies, and history itself. Many of the authors have played a crucial role in producing the historic turn in their own disciplines. The volume as a whole, therefore, goes significantly beyond a mere inventory of these changes to ask how and how much history can make a difference; how the practice of history is affected by post-structural and other theories; and what is left of both unproblematized history and social science after the historic turn. Taken together the essays give a sense both of what these various turns to history have in common and what sets them apart. This comparative dimension distinguishes the volume from those that have analyzed the impact of history on a single field or have assayed its effects without including historians themselves. In the wake of the historic turn neither the historical actor nor the historical analyst will ever again be seen as a colossus striding over the pages of history. This volume explains in an extraordinary thought-provoking and challenging way why this must be so.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094
“This is crucial because some claim to be witnessing a "historic turn" in the social sciences (McDonald 1996), but there is much confusion about what such a turn might mean.”
BackgroundThe multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms
Geels, F. W. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · Cited by 3,092
Re-Turn to Practice: An Introductory Essay
Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609349860 · Cited by 441
Ethnicity, Race, and Nationalism
Brubaker, R. (2009) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115916 · Cited by 418
Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and “Small N's” in Sociology
Steinmetz, G. (2004) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00225.x · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Venue
- University of Michigan Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Michigan Press
- Published
- 1996
- OpenAlex
- W3152089704
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 119.84
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3998/mpub.23606
- The paper
- The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. (1996). University of Michigan Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.