Variation, chaos et système en interlangue française
Open accessAbstract
La présente étude considère le phénomène d’instabilité dans le choix des pronoms d’adresse (vous et tu) en français natif et non-natif. Nous arguons que la Théorie du Chaos et de la Complexité offre des concepts utiles pour décrire les interactions extrêmement complexes qui déterminent le choix de pronoms d’adresse. L’usage dépend premièrement du niveau de compétence grammaticale des apprenants et deuxièmement de leur niveau de compétence sociolinguistique. Ce savoir est d’abord de nature explicite, stocké dans la mémoire déclarative, et est reconstruit plus tard comme savoir implicite dans la mémoire implicite. Ce n’est que lorsque les apprenants ont développé les représentations conceptuelles nécessaires sur l’usage « approprié » du vouvoiement et du tutoiement qu’ils peuvent se rapprocher de l’usage variable des natifs. Tant que ces représentations conceptuelles sont incomplètes, les apprenants ont des taux d’usage très dispersés.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
tu is the second-person pronoun used almost exclusively by many immersion students.
“By far the most frequent of the two forms, as well as the one with simpler verb forms, tu is the secondperson pronoun used almost exclusively by many immersion students”
From Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: implications for theory and practice (2004) · cites this paper as Dewaele, 2002
Section 2.2 quotes an observation that some French second-language learners use tu almost exclusively. It does not establish that this is true of many immersion students: the immersion study discussed in the same section concerns improvement in the use of vous. The cited passages also do not establish that tu is by far the more frequent form or has simpler verb forms. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: implications for theory and practice
LYSTER, R. (2004) · Journal of French Language Studies · doi:10.1017/s0959269504001826 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dewaele, J.-M.
- Affiliations
- Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dewaele, Jean-Marc
- ORCID
- Dewaele, Jean-Marc
- Venue
- Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère
- Publisher
- OpenEdition
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 143-167
- ISSN
- 1243-969X (ISSN-L)
- 1778-7432
- OpenAlex
- W1900814885
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 39 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère (publishedVersion)
- BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
- OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- YorkSpace (York University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › French Language Learning Methods
- Keywords
- address terms, French as a second language, grammatical variation, sociolinguistic competence, conceptual representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
