The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactionism, Energy Conservation, and the Violation of Physical Laws
Abstract
The law of energy conservation is either analytic and not threatened by psychophysical interactionism or contingent upon the causal closure of the physical world which interactionism denies. In either case, interactionism implies departures from the laws of physics, despite attempts to demonstrate the contrary by exploiting the loophole of quantum mechanical indetenninism. These departures are best fonnulated in tenns of modifications, by the conscious self, of the electromagnetic interactions betweenparticles. The electromag-netic vector potential is essentially a summary representation of effects on the motion of particles; these effects can be caused by mental eventsjust as well as by physical events. The interactionist hypothesis implies that the modifications caused by the self cannot be described by mathematical laws. Therefore. the interactions between particles that are modified by a self cannot take place in strict accordance with any physical law. Interactionism, finally, is not irrevocably committed to dualism: it can be incorporated into a panpsychism which pennits the self and the particles constituting the body to be thought of as different aspects of the same causal agent. Key words: conservation laws, energy, free will, indeterminism, indistinguishable particles, mental causation, momentum, panpsycbism, psychophysical interactionism, vector potential
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mohrhoff and Collins (independently) follow a very common interpretation in the physics and philosophy of physics communities (Misner et al. 1973, p. 467) that denies the physical meaning of the formal mathematics of “pseudotensor” conservation laws in General Relativity.”
From General Relativity, Mental Causation, and Energy Conservation (2022) · cites this paper as Mohrhoff 1997
Citations
Cites
Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals
Miguel Blasco, L. D. (1966) · Students Quarterly Journal · doi:10.1049/sqj.1966.0063 · Cited by 9,884
Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
von Neumann, J. (2018) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400889921 · Cited by 5,072
Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics
Offenbacher, E. L. (1955) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(55)90752-3 · Cited by 3,129
Lycan, W. G., & Dennett, D. C. (1993) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185913 · Cited by 2,673
Eddington, A. S. (1958) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.12945584 · Cited by 798
How the SELF Controls Its BRAIN
Eccles, J. C. (1994) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-49224-2 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What quantum mechanics is trying to tell us
Mohrhoff, U. (2000) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.19535 · Cited by 41
Self-citationDivine Action, Determinism, and the Laws of Nature
Koperski, J. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429029110 · Cited by 29
Conservation Laws and the Philosophy of Mind: Opening the Black Box, Finding a Mirror
Pitts, J. B. (2019) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-019-00102-7 · Cited by 29
The World According to Quantum Mechanics (Or the 18 Errors of Henry P. Stapp)
Mohrhoff, U. (2002) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1014409209728 · Cited by 18
Self-citationConservation of Energy: Missing Features in Its Nature and Justification and Why They Matter
Pitts, J. B. (2020) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-020-09657-1 · Cited by 17
The world according to quantum mechanics
Arntzenius, F. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696604.003.0003 · Cited by 7
Reflections on the Spatiotemporal Aspects of the Quantum World
Mohrhoff, U. (2002) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 7
Self-citationREFLECTIONS ON THE SPATIOTEMPORAL ASPECTS OF THE QUANTUM WORLD
MOHRHOFF, U. (2002) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732302007533 · Cited by 5
Self-citationGeneral Relativity, Mental Causation, and Energy Conservation
Pitts, J. B. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00284-7 · Cited by 1
Non-Cartesian Dualism and Meso-relational Media
Lubashevsky, I. (2017) · Understanding complex systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51706-3_5 · Cited by 1
THE WORLD ACCORDING TO QUANTUM MECHANICS
Mohrhoff, U. (2011) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789814293389 · Cited by 1
Self-citationOn Two Slights to Noether’s First Theorem: Mental Causation and General Relativity
Pitts, J. B. (2022) · Jerusalem studies in philosophy and history of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96775-8_10 · Cited by 1
Jiao, B., Wang, C., & Zhou, Z. (2025) · Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering (Formerly Recent Patents on Electrical & Electronic Engineering) · doi:10.2174/0123520965394883250827063427 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohrhoff, U.
- Corresponding author
- Mohrhoff, Ulrich
- ORCID
- Mohrhoff, Ulrich
- Venue
- Physics Essays
- Publisher
- Physics Essays Publication
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 651-665
- ISSN
- 0836-1398 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967644071
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physics Essays (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- energy conservation (physics), quantum indeterminism, free will, mental causation, electromagnetic vector potential, panpsychism, dualism, momentum conservation, identical particles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review