Cited by 5User Authentication and Security SystemsBiometric Identification and SecuritySecurity and Verification in Computing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Importance of a Versatile Logging Tool for Behavioural Biometrics and Continuous Authentication Research

Mondal, Soumik, Bours, Patrick, Johansen, Lasse, Stenvi, Robin, Øverbø, Magnus·2017·Advances in Information Security, Privacy, and Ethics

Abstract

We present the design and implementation of a Windows operating system based logging tool, which can capture the keystroke, mouse, software interaction and hardware usage simultaneously and continuously. Log data can be stored locally or transmitted in a secure manner to a server. Filter drivers are used to log with high precision. Privacy of the users and confidentiality of sensitive data have been taken into account throughout the development of the tool. Our behaviour logging software is mainly designed for behavioural biometrics research, but its scope could also be beneficial to proactive forensics and intrusion detection. We show the validity of the tool in a study of keyboard and mouse data uses for continuous authentication.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/978-1-5225-0703-1.ch013

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant limitation of Li et al.'s work is that detecting key dynamics required the installation of a custom-developed keylogger called BeLT because traditional chat clients do not record and transmit these.

    “A significant limitation of this work is that detecting key dynamics, such as the latency between releasing the first and pressing the second key, required the installation of a custom-developed keylogger called BeLT (Mondal et al., 2017) because traditional chat clients do not record and transmit these.”

    From Tainted Love: a Systematic Literature Review of Online Romance Scam Research (2023) · cites this paper as Mondal et al., 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mondal, S., Bours, P., Johansen, L., Stenvi, R., & Øverbø, M.
Affiliations
  • Gjøvik University College (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
Advances in Information Security, Privacy, and Ethics
Publisher
IGI Global
Published
2017
Pages
282-305
ISSN
  • 1948-9730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-9749
OpenAlex
W2510768727
Cited by
5
References
16
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
Keywords
behavioral biometrics, continuous authentication, keystroke logging, user privacy, data confidentiality, intrusion detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review