The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design and Implementation of Higher Education Learners' Learning Outcomes (HELLO)
Abstract
EISBN - 9781668494738
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CT is not merely a desirable attribute but a foundational skill for professional practice and innovation in higher education.
“These risks are particularly pressing in higher education, where CT is not merely a desirable attribute but a foundational skill for professional practice and innovation [1,16].”
From A Systematic Literature Review on the Pedagogical Implications and Impact of GenAI on Students' Critical Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Balart, T., Díaz, B., & Shryock, K. (2026) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a19030179 · Cited by 29
Pratiwi, H., Sujarwo, S., Syamsudin, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/10901027.2024.2421189 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Barua, K., Radwan, N., Singh, V., & Figueiredo, R.
- Venue
- Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development
- Publisher
- IGI Global
- Published
- 2023-12-22
- ISSN
- 2327-6983 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-6991
- OpenAlex
- W4390113484
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in higher education and professional development book series (publishedVersion)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Learning Practices
- Keywords
- learning outcomes, higher education learners, learning outcomes assessment, curriculum development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
