Cited by 5Digital Transformation of Higher EducationEducation and Technology IntegrationTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Higher Education Culture and the Diffusion of Technology in Classroom Instruction

Smith, Kandis M.·2000·Case Studies on Information Technology in Higher Education

Abstract

The diffusion of an innovation takes, on an average, 25 years in an educational setting. Many factors contribute to this slow acceptance rate. Rogers’ (1995) theory on the diffusion of innovation and the influence of culture on such diffusion is used to shed light on the causes for this slow diffusion. While not a full explanation of this slow rate of change, this case study shows that the academic culture, within which faculty function, has a strong influence on the diffusion of the use of technology in classroom instruction. This case study provides a point of reference for further study of diffusion of technology in classroom instruction. This case focuses on a Research I institution in the Midwest that has made a number of commitments to the integration of technology into the curriculum and has channeled many resources into this campaign. While the institution has invested large sums of money in the development of the infrastructure, the rate at which faculty have adopted the use of technology in their teaching has remained low. In order to determine the perceptions of faculty and develop some framework for understanding why the infusion of technology into classroom instruction was so low, faculty members on the campus were interviewed, focus groups were conducted, and meetings between faculty and administrators concerning technology issues were observed. Because additional issues exist with distance education, the scope of this case study research was limited to on-campus classroom instruction and support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/978-1-878289-74-2.ch012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technology diffusion in universities can be a complex process involving issues of power, legitimacy, and identity.

    “While HEIs contribute to AI governance at a societal level, technology diffusion in universities itself can also be a complex process involving issues of power, legitimacy, and identity [10].”

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Kandis M.
Venue
Case Studies on Information Technology in Higher Education
Publisher
IGI Global
Published
2000
Pages
144-156
OpenAlex
W4248529694
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IGI Global eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital Transformation of Higher Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
diffusion of innovations, academic culture, educational technology adoption, classroom teaching, teacher perceptions, technology integration in curriculum, higher education, Rogers diffusion theory, faculty attitudes toward technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review