Cited by 42Digital Transformation in Financial ServicesInnovation and Knowledge ManagementAI in Service Interactions

Artificial Intelligence as an Enabling Tool for the Development of Dynamic Capabilities in the Banking Industry

Gallego-Gomez, Cristina, De-Pablos-Heredero, Carmen·2020·International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems

Abstract

Banks are investing in artificial intelligence (AI) to develop more innovative business models in order to face competition. The main objective of this paper consists in analyzing bank experiences when they introduce AI from the theory of dynamic capabilities and the resource-based view approach. Documentary research enables the description of experiences in three companies from the financial industry. It has been considered of interest to include different international experiences. For that reason, a firm providing debit and credit card services has been included, MasterCard, along with international banks such as Royal Bank of Scotland and Caixa Bank. Results show that AI enables firms to promote new relationships with customers, detect their needs or experiences, and adapt the service given by firms to be more competitive. AI also allows them to speed up responses to customers answers and doubts through its value chain. This research also shows that the proper implementation of AI permits a reconfiguration of traditional banking scenario. Detection, absorption, integration, and innovation are capabilities that allow these firms to build the managerial skills oriented to save costs, increase efficiency, and be more competitive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/ijeis.2020070102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallego-Gomez, C., & De-Pablos-Heredero, C.
Affiliations
  • International University of La Rioja (UNIR), Spain
  • ESIC Business and Marketing School, Spain & Rey Juan Carlos University, Spain
Venue
International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems
Published
2020-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
20-33
ISSN
  • 1548-1115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1123
OpenAlex
W3045595302
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • Re-Unir (International University of La Rioja) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Financial Services
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
artificial intelligence, dynamic capabilities, banking sector, resource-based view, business model innovation, customer relationship management, competitive advantage, value chain, MasterCard, Royal Bank of Scotland, AI implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review