Cited by 20Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignInformation Architecture and Usability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implications for Improving Accessibility to E-Commerce Websites in Developing Countries: A Study of Hotel Websites

Sambhanthan, Arunasalam, Good, Alice·2012·International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations

Abstract

This research explores the accessibility issues with regard to the e-commerce websites in developing countries, through a study of Sri Lankan hotel websites. A web survey and a web content analysis were conducted as the methods to elicit data on web accessibility. Factors preventing accessibility were hypothesized as an initial experiment. Affecting design elements are identified through web content analysis, the results of which are utilized to develop specific implications for improving web accessibility. The hypothesis tests show that there is no significant correlation between accessibility and geographical or economic factors. However, physical impairments of users have a considerable influence on the accessibility of web page user interface if it has been designed without full consideration of the needs of all users. Poor readability and less navigable page designs are two observable issues, which pose threats to accessibility. The lack of conformance to W3C accessibility guidelines and the poor design process are the specific shortcomings which reduce the overall accessibility. Further enhancements are suggested with adherence to principles, user – centered design and developing customizable web portals compatible for connections with differing speeds. Re-ordering search results has been suggested as one of the finest step towards making the web content accessible for users with differing needs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/ijkbo.2012040101

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. A.Abanumy, 2005, e-Government website accessibility: In depth evaluation of Saudi Arabia and Oman. The Electronic, Journal of E-Government, 3, 99
  2. 10.1147/sj.443.0589 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/1278234.1278236 · DOI
  4. I.Buick, 2003, Information technology in small Scottish hotels: Is it working?, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 615, 243
  5. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.04.004 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/135676670100700206 · DOI
  7. 10.4018/978-1-878289-69-8.ch002 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.annals.2007.07.005 · DOI
  9. P. L.Emiliani, 2001, Special needs and enabling technologies: An evolving approach to accessibility, User interfaces for all: Concepts, methods and tools
  10. Good, A. (2008). An investigation of a method for improving accessibility to web-based information for users with impairments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
  11. A.Good, 2007, Elderly, novice users and health information websites – Issues of accessibility and usability., Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 21, 72
  12. 10.1145/1029014.1028638 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1356766708100904 · DOI
  14. 10.1108/eb058447 · DOI
  15. M.Kuniavsky, 2004, Observing the user experience: A practitioner's guide to user research
  16. 10.1080/10941660600753273 · DOI
  17. Leitner, M., & Strauss, C. (2008). Exploratory case study research on web accessibility. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler, & A. Karshmer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (LNCS 6179, pp. 490-497). · DOI
  18. 10.1038/scientificamerican0397-52 · DOI
  19. P.Lynch, 2001, Web style guide
  20. Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., & Karshmer, A. (Eds.). (2008). Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (LNCS 6179). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. · DOI
  21. 10.1147/sj.443.0557 · DOI
  22. J.Nielsen, 1993, The trouble with computers: Usefulness, usability, and productivity
  23. Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Empowering People. · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.03.012 · DOI
  25. Preece, J., & Maloney-Krichmar, D. (2005). Online communities: Design, theory and practice. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4). Retrieved March 31, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/preece.html · DOI
  26. J.Preece, 2001, Interaction design
  27. J.Preece, 1994, Human-computer interaction
  28. 10.1145/332833.332843 · DOI
  29. Sullivan, T., & Matson, R. (2000). Barriers to use: Usability and content accessibility on the web’s most popular sites. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Universal Usability. · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1177/0047287508321193 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sambhanthan, A., & Good, A.
Affiliations
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations
Published
2012-04-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 2155-6393 (ISSN-L)
  • 2155-6407
OpenAlex
W2047666829
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.10
Type
journal article
Language
ng
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Architecture and Usability
Keywords
web accessibility, e-commerce platforms, hotel websites, developing countries, Sri Lanka, physical impairment, readability, web navigation, W3C accessibility guidelines, user-centered design, search result ordering, web design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review