The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determinants of Personal Health Information Disclosure: A Case of Mobile Application
Abstract
This study explored the factors that affect personal health information (PHI) disclosure via a mobile application (app) in Thailand. Since mobile apps are increasingly popular, as is the Thai people's concern on their health condition, many mobile app service providers want to know which factors would persuade customers to reveal their PHI via mobile apps. This research model was, therefore, developed and included the six factors of: personalized service, self-presentation, mobile app reputation, familiarity, perceived benefits and privacy concerns. The hypotheses were tested by structural equation modeling using the questionnaire responses from 294 valid subjects. Surprisingly, privacy concern was not significantly negatively related to the intention to disclose PHI. However, the significance effect of the perceived benefit, personalized service and self-presentation were consistent with previous studies. In addition, the respondents were willing to reveal different personal information in different situations. The implication of the result will shed light on the development of a healthcare mobile app service provider.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This category also included two studies that modelled user intentions to disclose personal health information, including factors related to privacy concerns [92], or privacy preferences [93].”
From Security and Privacy of mHealth Applications: A Scoping Review (2020) · cites this paper as [92]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- J. C.Anderson, 1988, Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 3, 3411
- 10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
- M. B.Byrne, 2001, Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
- 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
- S.Kim, 2016, Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals’ adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16, 1
- 10.1016/j.im.2003.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.018 · DOI
- 10.1504/IJMC.2011.040608 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cose.2017.03.001 · DOI
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
- J. C.Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric Theory
- J. H.Steiger, 2007, Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling, Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 93
- 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Security and Privacy of mHealth Applications: A Scoping Review
Nurgalieva, L., O'Callaghan, D., & Doherty, G. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2999934 · Cited by 132
“This category also included two studies that modelled user intentions to disclose personal health information, including factors related to privacy concerns [92], or privacy preferences [93].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Atchariyachanvanich, K., Mitinunwong, N., Tamthong, B., & Sonehara, N.
- Affiliations
- King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (TH)
- Tsuda University (JP)
- Venue
- International Journal of Software Innovation
- Publisher
- IGI Global Scientific Publishing
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-43
- ISSN
- 2166-7160 (ISSN-L)
- 2166-7179
- OpenAlex
- W2765572442
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Software Innovation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- mobile health apps, privacy concerns, perceived benefits, personalized services, self-presentation, familiarity, disclosure intention, Thailand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
