Motivators for IOS Adoption in Denmark
Abstract
Organizational adoption of innovations does not always follow easily comprehendible patterns. This is often the case with interorganizational information systems (IOS), where adoption is dependent on attributes related both to the organization and to its environment. The present study operationalizes the Tornatzky and Fleischer (1990) model for organizational adoption in order to investigate reasons for adoption and non-adoption among businesses in the Danish steel and machinery industry. This particular industry segment had been subject to massive information campaigns focusing on the benefits of IOS in the form of EDI from business associations. The study suggests that environmental and organizational attributes rather than technological attributes are the main determining forces for adoption of EDI.Request access from your librarian to read this article's full text.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
T-O-E framework has robust empirical support in the IS field more than other adoption frameworks such as TAM, IDT, TRA, SM, and TPB.
“T-O-E framework is more holistic and size and industry friendly (Wen & Chen, 2010), has robust empirical support in IS field more than other adoption frameworks (e.g.TAM, IDT, TRA, SM, and TPB) (Henriksen, 2006;Hong, Thong, & Tam, 2006;Kuan & Chau, 2001;Yoon & George, 2013;Zheng, Yen, & Tarn, 2011;Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003) and meets the contemporary scholarly demand (Barrett, Grant, & Wailes, 2006”
From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Henriksen, 2006
Henriksen (2006) reported that organizational and environmental factors are more critical adoption determinants than do the technological attributes.
“In their study of the Danish steel and machinery industry within the context of T-O-E framework, Henriksen (2006) contrasted this finding when he reported that organizational and environmental factors are more critical adoption determinants than do the technological attributes.”
From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Henriksen (2006)
Cites
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401 · see citing works
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study1
Chau, P. Y. K., & Tam, K. Y. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249740 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution
Awa, H. O., Ukoha, O., & Emecheta, B. C. (2016) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2016.1196571 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
“In their study of the Danish steel and machinery industry within the context of T-O-E framework, Henriksen (2006) contrasted this finding when he reported that organizational and environmental factors are more critical adoption determinants than do the technological attributes.”
BackgroundInfluentialAn Empirical Study of Some Critical Adoption Factors of ERP Software
Awa, H. O., Uko, J. P., & Ukoha, O. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1265828 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
- Authors
- Henriksen, H. Z.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen Business School (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Henriksen, Helle Zinner
- Venue
- Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations
- Publisher
- IGI Global Scientific Publishing
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 25-39
- ISSN
- 1539-2929 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-2937
- OpenAlex
- W2076356927
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- interorganizational systems, electronic data interchange, technology adoption, organizational adoption, environmental characteristics, organizational characteristics, steel industry, machine-building industry, information campaigns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
