Cited by 2Image and Signal Denoising MethodsImage Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Image Filtering Algorithm for Removing Mixed Noise

Open access
Chu, Mao Xiang, Wang, An Na, Gong, Rong Fen·2013·Applied Mechanics and Materials

Abstract

In order to remove salt-and-pepper noise and Gaussian noise in image, a novel filtering algorithm is proposed in this paper. The novel algorithm can preserve image edge details as much as possible. Firstly, five-median-binary code (FMBC) is proposed and used to describe local edge type of image. Secondly, median filter algorithm is improved to remove salt-and-pepper noise by using FMBC. Then, local enhanced bilateral filter with FMBC and a new type of exponential weighting function is used to remove Gaussian noise. Simulation results show that the algorithm proposed in this paper is very effective not only in filtering mixed noise but also in preserving edge details.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.433-435.383

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Y.Y. Zhou and Z.F. Ye: International Conference on Multimedia Technology (2011), p.4752.
  2. X.B. Li, D.S. Jiang and Z.L. Wang: Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Vol. 41 (2012), p.114 (In Chinese).
  3. Y.D. Ma, D.M. Lin, B.D. Zhang, Q. Liu and J.S. Gu: IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (2007), p.1499.
  4. C. Tomasi and R. Manduchi: Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (1998), p.839.
  5. A.H. Shabani, J.S. Zelek and D.A. Clausi: Ninth Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (2012), p.383.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chu, M. X., Wang, A. N., & Gong, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University
  • Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Applied Mechanics and Materials
Published
2013-10-15
Volume
433-435
Pages
383-388
ISSN
  • 1660-9336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-7482
OpenAlex
W2011956741
Cited by
2
References
8
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Mechanics and Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
image filtering, mixed noise removal, salt and pepper noise, Gaussian noise, median filter, edge preservation, bilateral filter, exponential weighting function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review