Cited by 1Reliability and Maintenance OptimizationFault Detection and Control SystemsMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

A Fusion Prognostics Framework Based on FMMEA and Bayesian Theory

Tao, Yong Jian·2012·Advanced Materials Research

Abstract

Prognostics approaches can assess system reliability in its actual life-cycle conditions, provide advance warning of failure, and reduce system maintenance cost. In all prognostics approaches, identification of appropriate monitored parameters, which can be employed to predict imminent failure, is critical. However traditional approaches, data-driven prognostics and model-based prognostics have their limitations. This paper proposes a fusion prognostics framework, which identifies the appropriate parameters monitored by failure modes, mechanisms and effects analysis (FMMEA), and predicts system remaining useful life by data-driven prognostics based on Bayesian theory. The fusion prognostics framework leverage the strength from both approaches to provide better predictions of remain useful life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.569.703

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accurate prognostics requires reliable measurement of the states of the system, which can be compromised by sensor degradation and the resulting measurement uncertainty.

    “Accurate prognostics requires reliable measurement on the states of the system, which can be compromised by sensor degradation and the resulting measurement uncertainty”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tao, Y. J.
Affiliations
East China Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tao, Yong Jian
Venue
Advanced Materials Research
Published
2012-09
Volume
569
Pages
703-706
ISSN
  • 1022-6680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-8985
OpenAlex
W1985048305
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced materials research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Keywords
Bayesian theory, remaining useful life prediction, data-driven prognostics, model-based prognostics, system reliability, failure prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review