A Fusion Prognostics Framework Based on FMMEA and Bayesian Theory
Abstract
Prognostics approaches can assess system reliability in its actual life-cycle conditions, provide advance warning of failure, and reduce system maintenance cost. In all prognostics approaches, identification of appropriate monitored parameters, which can be employed to predict imminent failure, is critical. However traditional approaches, data-driven prognostics and model-based prognostics have their limitations. This paper proposes a fusion prognostics framework, which identifies the appropriate parameters monitored by failure modes, mechanisms and effects analysis (FMMEA), and predicts system remaining useful life by data-driven prognostics based on Bayesian theory. The fusion prognostics framework leverage the strength from both approaches to provide better predictions of remain useful life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accurate prognostics requires reliable measurement of the states of the system, which can be compromised by sensor degradation and the resulting measurement uncertainty.
“Accurate prognostics requires reliable measurement on the states of the system, which can be compromised by sensor degradation and the resulting measurement uncertainty”
From Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: (2025) · cites this paper as Tao, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thai, T.-T. N., Do, P., Iung, B., & Gardoni, P. (2025) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2025.v16i4.4306 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tao, Y. J.
- Affiliations
- East China Jiaotong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tao, Yong Jian
- Venue
- Advanced Materials Research
- Publisher
- Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 569
- Pages
- 703-706
- ISSN
- 1022-6680 (ISSN-L)
- 1662-8985
- OpenAlex
- W1985048305
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Advanced materials research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Keywords
- Bayesian theory, remaining useful life prediction, data-driven prognostics, model-based prognostics, system reliability, failure prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review