Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,073

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

WinPLOTR: A Windows Tool for Powder Diffraction Pattern Analysis

Roisnel, T., Rodríquez-Carvajal, Juan·2001·Materials Science Forum

Abstract

WinPLOTR is a graphic program for the analysis of powder diffraction patterns. It has been developed for a Windows 9x/2k/NT environment. It takes advantage of this graphical environment to offer a powerful and user-friendly powder diffraction tool. The program is able to display and analyse many different kinds of diffraction patterns as well as calculated and observed profiles coming from the Windows/DOS version of the program FullProf. It can also be used as a Graphic User Interface (GUI) for programs defined by the user.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.378-381.118

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,073

Metadata

Authors
Roisnel, T., & Rodríquez-Carvajal, J.
Venue
Materials Science Forum
Published
2001-10-10
Volume
378-381
Pages
118-123
ISSN
  • 0255-5476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-9752
OpenAlex
W2042246569
Cited by
2,073
References
0
FWCI
17.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WinPLOTR: A Windows Tool for Powder Diffraction Pattern Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.378-381.118
The paper
Roisnel, T., & Rodríquez-Carvajal, J. (2001). WinPLOTR: A Windows Tool for Powder Diffraction Pattern Analysis. Materials Science Forum. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.378-381.118

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.