Cited by 4Food Safety and HygieneNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

Food safety knowledge, attitude, and practices among school children: a cross-sectional study based in the Colombo educational zone, Sri Lanka

Open access
Wanniarachchi, Piyumi Chathurangi, Abeysundara, Piumi, Peiris, Hashan Savinda·2023·Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences

Abstract

The study focuses on assessing the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of food safety among school children in the city of Colombo, Sri Lanka, based on a questionnaire survey conducted from September to October 2020, with a sample of 380 teenagers from a selection of schools in the Colombo Educational Zone, Sri Lanka. It reports that the mean food safety knowledge, attitude, and practice scores of the participants were 59.949 ± 0.833, 84.336 ± 0.448, and 79.597 ± 0.616 (mean ± SE) respectively and hypothesises that the food safety practice score and the attitude score of school children both significantly increase relative to their food safety knowledge score ( rp = 0.205, p < 0.001 and rp = 0.359, p < 0.001). A multiple linear regression analysis of the data establishes that the food safety knowledge score of the male participants is higher than that of the female participants and that poor food handling practices are common among the males in the population. The results further demonstrate a correlation between the individual schoolchild’s academic performance, the educational background of his/her parents, and his/her knowledge of food safety. The present study reveals that the school children in Colombo Education Zone maintain an average level of food safety knowledge and satisfactory levels of food safety attitudes and practices. Thus, the authors suggest that school children should be provided with appropriate education and training to enhance their current level of food safety knowledge, especially about proper temperature control during food processing and food handling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4038/sljss.v45i2.8586

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wanniarachchi, P. C., Abeysundara, P., & Peiris, H. S.
Affiliations
University of Sri Jayewardenepura (LK)
Corresponding author
Peiris, Hashan Savinda
Venue
Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2023-04-27
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
241-253
ISSN
  • 0258-9710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2478-1169
OpenAlex
W4367341314
Cited by
4
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Keywords
food safety knowledge, food safety attitudes, food safety practices, elementary school students, adolescents, food handling, gender differences, parental education, academic performance, food temperature control, food hygiene education, Colombo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review