The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EVOLUTION OF THE HIND WING IN COLEOPTERA
Abstract
A survey is made of the major features of the venation, articulation, and folding in the hind wings of Coleoptera. The documentation is based upon examination of 108 Coleoptera families and 200 specimens, and shown in 101 published figures. Wing veins and articular sclerites are homologized with elements of the neopteran wing groundplan, resulting in wing vein terminology that differs substantially from that generally used by coleopterists. We tabulate the differences between currently used venational nomenclature and the all-pterygote homologous symbols. The use of the neopteran groundplan, combined with the knowledge of the way in which veins evolved, provides many strong characters linked to the early evolutionary radiation of Coleoptera. The order originated with the development of the apical folding of the hind wings under the elytra executed by the radial and medial loop. The loops, which are very complex venational structures, further diversified in four distinctly different ways which mark the highest (suborder) taxa. The remaining venation and the wing articulation have changed with the loops, which formed additional synapomorphies and autapomorphies at the suborder, superfamily, and sometimes even family and tribe levels. Relationships among the four currently recognized suborders of Coleoptera are reexamined using hind wing characters. The number of wing-related apomorphies are 16 in Coleoptera, seven in Archostemata + Adephaga–Myxophaga, four in Adephaga–Myxophaga, seven in Myxophaga, nine in Archostemata, and five in Polyphaga. The following phylogenetic scheme is suggested: Polyphaga [Archostemata (Adephaga + Myxophaga)]. Venational evidence is given to define two major lineages (the hydrophiloid and the eucinetoid) within the suborder Polyphaga. The unique apical wing folding mechanism of beetles is described. Derived types of wing folding are discussed, based mainly on a survey of recent literature. A sister group relationship between Coleoptera and Strepsiptera is supported by hind wing evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Insect Morphology
Goodrich, A. L., & Snodgrass, R. E. (1936) · Transactions of the American Microscopical Society · doi:10.2307/3223017 · Cited by 1,630
Principles of Insect Morphology
(1935) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/aesa/28.3.408 · Cited by 873
The natural classification of the families of coleoptera
Crowson, R. A. (1967) · Cited by 460
Evolution and Classification of Beetles
Lawrence, J. F., & Newton, A. F. (1982) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001401 · Cited by 372
Self-citationThe Natural Classification of the Families of Coleoptera
Hatch, M. H. (1956) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/aesa/49.1.102 · Cited by 343
Support and deformability in insect wings
Wootton, R. J. (1981) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb01497.x · Cited by 326
Origin of the insect wing and wing articulation from the arthropodan leg
Kukalová-Peck, J. (1983) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z83-217 · Cited by 265
Self-citationKukalova‐Peck, J. (1978) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.1051560104 · Cited by 249
Crowson, R. A. (1960) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.05.010160.000551 · Cited by 229
The ecology of Paleozoic terrestrial arthropods: the fossil evidence
Shear, W. A., & Kukalová-Peck, J. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z90-262 · Cited by 219
Self-citation
Cited by
The Phylogeny of the Extant Hexapod Orders
Wheeler, W. (2001) · Cladistics · doi:10.1006/clad.2000.0147 · Cited by 503
The Phylogeny of the Extant Hexapod Orders
Wheeler, W. C., Whiting, M., Wheeler, Q. D., & Carpenter, J. M. (2001) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00115.x · Cited by 508
TTAGG Telomeric Repeats in Chromosomes of Some Insects and Other Arthropods
Sahara, K., Marec, F., & Traut, W. (1999) · Chromosome Research · doi:10.1023/a:1009297729547 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Kukalová-Peck, J., & Lawrence, J. F.
- Venue
- The Canadian Entomologist
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-258
- ISSN
- 0008-347X (ISSN-L)
- 1918-3240
- OpenAlex
- W2157719590
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVOLUTION OF THE HIND WING IN COLEOPTERA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4039/ent125181-2
- The paper
- Kukalová-Peck, J., & Lawrence, J. F. (1993). EVOLUTION OF THE HIND WING IN COLEOPTERA. The Canadian Entomologist. https://doi.org/10.4039/ent125181-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.