Cited by 25Dental materials and restorationsAdvanced ceramic materials synthesisBone Tissue Engineering Materials

Influence of heat treatment on the microstructure and the physical and mechanical properties of dental highly translucent zirconia

Open access
Dimitriadis, Konstantinos, Sfikas, Athanasios Konstantinou, Kamnis, Spyros, Tsolka, Pepie, Agathopoulos, Simeon·2022·The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

Abstract

PURPOSE: study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: values smaller than 5% were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A homogenous microstructure, with no residual porosity and grains sized between 500 and 450 nm for group A and B, respectively, was observed. Crystalline yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia was exclusively registered in the X-ray diffractograms. The mechanical properties decreased after the heat treatment procedure, but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The produced zirconia ceramic materials can be safely (i.e., according to the ISO 6872) used in extensive fixed prosthetic restorations, such as substructure ceramics for three-unit prostheses involving the molar restoration and substructure ceramics for prostheses involving four or more units. Consequently, milling technology is an effective manufacturing technology for producing zirconia substructures for dental fixed all-ceramic prosthetic restorations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.96

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by the conventional method have a lower marginal fit compared to zirconia restorations fabricated by the CAD/CAM method.

    “this type of restoration fabricated by the conventional method has a lower marginal fit compared to zirconia restorations fabricated by the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) method”

    From Potential Impact of Prosthetic Biomaterials on the Periodontium: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes CAD/CAM zirconia restorations as having dimensional precision, which supports the claim's general point about their fit. It does not assess marginal fit or compare CAD/CAM zirconia with conventionally fabricated metal-ceramic restorations, so the claimed difference is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Baino F Tomalino M Tulyaganov D Ceramics, glass and glass-ceramics 1st ed New York Springer 2021 153 200
  2. [33]Kinney JH Marshall SJ Marshall GW The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003 14 13 29 12764017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimitriadis, K., Sfikas, A. K., Kamnis, S., Tsolka, P., & Agathopoulos, S.
Affiliations
  • University of West Attica (GR)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • Castolin Eutectic (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
Corresponding author
Dimitriadis, Konstantinos
Venue
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Publisher
XMLink
Published
2022
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
96
ISSN
  • 2005-7806 (ISSN-L)
  • 2005-7814
OpenAlex
W4282915864
Cited by
25
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2023-12-18)
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
translucent zirconia, heat treatment, yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia, microstructure, mechanical properties, physical properties, milling technology, fixed partial dentures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review