Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neonatal Innate TLR-Mediated Responses Are Distinct from Those of Adults

Open access
Kollmann, Tobias R, Crabtree, Juliet, Rein-Weston, Annie, Blimkie, Darren, Thommai, Francis, Wang, Xiu Yu, Lavoie, Pascal M, Furlong, Jeff, Fortuno, Edgardo S, Hajjar, Adeline M, Hawkins, Natalie R, Self, Steven G, Wilson, Christopher B·2009·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The human neonate and infant are unduly susceptible to infection with a wide variety of microbes. This susceptibility is thought to reflect differences from adults in innate and adaptive immunity, but the nature of these differences is incompletely characterized. The innate immune response directs the subsequent adaptive immune response after integrating information from TLRs and other environmental sensors. We set out to provide a comprehensive analysis defining differences in response to TLR ligation between human neonates and adults. In response to most TLR ligands, neonatal innate immune cells, including monocytes and conventional and plasmacytoid dendritic cells produced less IL-12p70 and IFN-α (and consequently induced less IFN-γ), moderately less TNF-α, but as much or even more IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, and IL-10 than adult cells. At the single-cell level, neonatal innate cells generally were less capable of producing multiple cytokines simultaneously, i.e., were less polyfunctional. Overall, our data suggest a robust if not enhanced capacity of the neonate vs the adult white-blood cell TLR-mediated response to support Th17- and Th2-type immunity, which promotes defense against extracellular pathogens, but a reduced capacity to support Th1-type responses, which promote defense against intracellular pathogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.0901481

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Kollmann, T. R., Crabtree, J., Rein-Weston, A., Blimkie, D., Thommai, F., Wang, X. Y., Lavoie, P. M., Furlong, J., Fortuno, E. S., Hajjar, A. M., Hawkins, N. R., Self, S. G., & Wilson, C. B.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2009-12-01
Volume
183
Issue
11
Pages
7150-7160
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2139150306
Cited by
466
References
3
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neonatal Innate TLR-Mediated Responses Are Distinct from Those of Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.0901481
The paper
Kollmann, T. R., Crabtree, J., Rein-Weston, A., Blimkie, D., Thommai, F., Wang, X. Y., Lavoie, P. M., Furlong, J., Fortuno, E. S., Hajjar, A. M., Hawkins, N. R., Self, S. G., & Wilson, C. B. (2009). Neonatal Innate TLR-Mediated Responses Are Distinct from Those of Adults. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0901481

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.