Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Significance of the Mast Cell Response to Bee Venom

Higginbotham, R D, Karnella, S·1971·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Local tissue mast cells were found to rapidly secrete their heparin-containing granules in a dose-related response to subcutaneous injection of relatively small amounts of bee venom. The shed granules formed complexes with cationic protein in vivo and these complexes were subsequently ingested by adjacent mononuclear cells. Addition of heparin to bee venom in vitro resulted in the formation of complexes with reduction in both cytolytic and lethal activities of the venom. It is suggested that mast cell granules may, during transfer from mast cells to phagocytic cells, sequester noxious cationic proteins of bee venom and that dermal mast cells may thus be strategically situated and uniquely adapted to serve as a local means of resistance to bee sting.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.106.1.233

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Higginbotham, R. D., & Karnella, S.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1971-01-01
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
233-240
ISSN
  • 0022-1767
  • 1550-6606
Cited by
32
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Significance of the Mast Cell Response to Bee Venom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.106.1.233
The paper
Higginbotham, R. D., & Karnella, S. (1971). The Significance of the Mast Cell Response to Bee Venom. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.106.1.233