Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reciprocal Negative Cross-Talk between Liver X Receptors (LXRs) and STAT1: Effects on IFN-γ–Induced Inflammatory Responses and LXR-Dependent Gene Expression

Pascual-García, Mónica, Rué, Laura, León, Theresa, Julve, Josep, Carbó, José María, Matalonga, Jonathan, Auer, Herbert, Celada, Antonio, Escolà-Gil, Joan Carles, Steffensen, Knut R, Pérez-Navarro, Esther, Valledor, Annabel F·2013·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Liver X receptors (LXRs) exert key functions in lipid homeostasis and in control of inflammation. In this study we have explored the impact of LXR activation on the macrophage response to the endogenous inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ. Transcriptional profiling studies demonstrate that ∼38% of the IFN-γ–induced transcriptional response is repressed by LXR activation in macrophages. LXRs also mediated inhibitory effects on selected IFN-γ–induced genes in primary microglia and in a model of IFN-γ–induced neuroinflammation in vivo. LXR activation resulted in reduced STAT1 recruitment to the promoters tested in this study without affecting STAT1 phosphorylation. A closer look into the mechanism revealed that SUMOylation of LXRs, but not the presence of nuclear receptor corepressor 1, was required for repression of the NO synthase 2 promoter. We have also analyzed whether IFN-γ signaling exerts reciprocal effects on LXR targets. Treatment with IFN-γ inhibited, in a STAT1-dependent manner, the LXR-dependent upregulation of selective targets, including ATP-binding cassette A1 (ABCA1) and sterol response element binding protein 1c. Downregulation of ABCA1 expression correlated with decreased cholesterol efflux to apolipoprotein A1 in macrophages stimulated with IFN-γ. The inhibitory effects of IFN-γ on LXR signaling did not involve reduced binding of LXR/retinoid X receptor heterodimers to target gene promoters. However, overexpression of the coactivator CREB-binding protein/p300 reduced the inhibitory actions of IFN-γ on the Abca1 promoter, suggesting that competition for CREB-binding protein may contribute to STAT1-dependent downregulation of LXR targets. The results from this study suggest an important level of bidirectional negative cross-talk between IFN-γ/STAT1 and LXRs with implications both in the control of IFN-γ–mediated immune responses and in the regulation of lipid metabolism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.1201393

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pascual-García, M., Rué, L., León, T., Julve, J., Carbó, J. M., Matalonga, J., Auer, H., Celada, A., Escolà-Gil, J. C., Steffensen, K. R., Pérez-Navarro, E., & Valledor, A. F.
Affiliations
  • Nuclear Receptor Group, Department of Physiology and Immunology, School of Biology, University of Barcelona , 08028 Barcelona,
  • Department of Cellular Biology, Immunology, and Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona , 08036 Barcelona,
  • Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau , 08025 Barcelona,
  • Functional Genomics Core Facility, Institute for Research in Biomedicine , Barcelona 08028,
  • Macrophage Biology Group, Department of Physiology and Immunology, School of Biology, University of Barcelona , 08028 Barcelona,
  • Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet , SE-14183 Stockholm,
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2013-06
Volume
190
Issue
12
Pages
6520-6532
ISSN
  • 0022-1767
  • 1550-6606
Cited by
51
References
57
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.