The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fibronectin fragment(s) are chemotactic for human peripheral blood monocytes.
Abstract
Both plasma-derived and cell-derived fibronectin are deposited at sites of inflammation and wound healing and are associated with migrating cell populations including monocytes/macrophages. We found that fibronectin fragments generated by endogenous protease(s) are potent chemoattractants for human peripheral blood monocytes, whereas intact fibronectin has no activity. Fibronectin preparations produced by gelatin affinity chromatography in the absence of protease inhibitors contained 90 to 220 kd fragments and had potent chemotactic and chemokinetic activity for monocytes but no activity for human neutrophils or lymphocytes. The addition of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to plasma reduced but did not eliminate the recovery of fibronectin fragments and likewise reduced the chemotactic activity. When the preparations were further purified by DEAE ion exchange and Sepharose 4B molecular sieve chromatography, however, intact fibronectin was recovered that lacked both chemotactic and chemokinetic activity. When fragment-poor fibronectin was allowed to sit at 25 degrees C in NaN3 but without protease inhibitors, increased fragmentation and increased chemotactic activity were noted. In addition, chemotactically active small m.w. fragments arose from high m.w. fragments or from intact fibronectin as demonstrated by rechromatography experiments over Sephadex G-150. These findings suggest that proteolytic cleavage of fibronectin during inflammatory processes produces fragments that selectively augment the recruitment of monocytes into tissue sites of inflammation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Inflammatory Response to Cell Death
Rock, K. L., & Kono, H. (2008) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151456 · Cited by 912
Ylä-Herttuala, S., Lipton, B. A., Rosenfeld, M. E., Särkioja, T., Yoshimura, T., Leonard, E. J., Witztum, J. L., & Steinberg, D. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.12.5252 · Cited by 872
Biomaterial biocompatibility and the macrophage
Anderson, J. M., & Miller, K. M. (1984) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(84)90060-7 · Cited by 403
Intracellular versus extracellular granzyme B in immunity and disease: challenging the dogma
Boivin, W. A., Cooper, D. M., Hiebert, P. R., & Granville, D. J. (2009) · Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1038/labinvest.2009.91 · Cited by 314
Fibronectin matrix deposition and fibronectin receptor expression in healing and normal skin
Clark, R. A. F. (1990) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12876104 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Norris, D. A., Clark, R. A. F., Swigart, L. M., Huff, J. C., Weston, W. L., & Howell, S. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1982-10-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1612-1618
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1504877712
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fibronectin fragment(s) are chemotactic for human peripheral blood monocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.129.4.1612
- The paper
- Norris, D. A., Clark, R. A. F., Swigart, L. M., Huff, J. C., Weston, W. L., & Howell, S. E. (1982). Fibronectin fragment(s) are chemotactic for human peripheral blood monocytes. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.129.4.1612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.