Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of the cytolytic reaction mechanism of the human natural killer (NK) lymphocyte: resolution into binding, programming, and killer cell-independent steps.

Hiserodt, J C, Britvan, L J, Targan, S R·1982·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Various parameters of the cytolytic reaction mechanisms of the human natural killer (NK) lymphocyte were studied to characterize the lytic cycle. NK cytolysis was determined to occur in three definable steps. 1) Binding of PBL to the NK-sensitive targets Molt-4 or K562 was rapid (less than 1 min), occurred at temperatures below 37 degrees C, was Mg++3-dependent, Ca++3-independent, and was prevented by dispersion of the cells into 10% dextran. 2) Subsequent to binding, programming for lysis as determined by a Ca++ pulse method was more protracted, requiring up to 2 hr to occur and was strictly dependent on Ca++ for cytolysis to proceed. In standard cytotoxicity assays, however, programming for lysis was more rapid occurring in 10 to 30 min. Programming was inhibited by EDTA, EGTA/Mg++ and by temperatures below 37 degrees C. Furthermore, after binding but in the absence of initiation of programming for lysis, the frequency of target binding cells did not change and the NK cell did not lose its lytic potential. 3) Killer cell-independent cytolysis (KCIL) was determined by the addition of EDTA to "programmed" targets and dispersion of these cells into dextran-containing medium, which resulted in virtually 100% dissociation of conjugated cells. KCIL was Ca++ and Mg++-independent and was blocked at reduced temperatures only if the dextran was prechilled to 4 degrees C before addition. The kinetics of 51Cr release during KCIL was rapid and complete 30 min after dispersion. Interferon-activated NK cells expressed an increased rate of cytolysis in Ca++ pulse experiments. This was due to an increased rate of the Ca++-dependent step(s) during the programming events. The rate of the Ca++-independent steps, however, were similar with control and IFN-activated cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.129.4.1782

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Hiserodt, J. C., Britvan, L. J., & Targan, S. R.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1982-10-01
Volume
129
Issue
4
Pages
1782-1787
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1847811994
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of the cytolytic reaction mechanism of the human natural killer (NK) lymphocyte: resolution into binding, programming, and killer cell-independent steps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.129.4.1782
The paper
Hiserodt, J. C., Britvan, L. J., & Targan, S. R. (1982). Characterization of the cytolytic reaction mechanism of the human natural killer (NK) lymphocyte: resolution into binding, programming, and killer cell-independent steps. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.129.4.1782

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.