The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human mononuclear phagocyte differentiation antigens. I. Patterns of antigenic expression on the surface of human monocytes and macrophages defined by monoclonal antibodies.
Abstract
Six newly developed monoclonal antibodies recognizing antigenic determinants expressed on the surface of human mononuclear phagocytes (MoPh) were applied to the antigenic analysis of this cell lineage. Antibody binding was detected by indirect immunofluorescence in conventional microscopy and flow microfluorometry. Through additive experiments, competitive blocking experiments and differences in the distribution histograms of immunofluorescence, evidence was obtained that each antibody detected a distinct antigenic determinant. Different increases in the amount of each antigen and in the frequency of positive cells were found on fluid or tissue macrophages when compared to blood monocytes. The six reagents could be placed in three general groups based on certain similar characteristics in their patterns of antigen expression. The reagents MϕP-9, MϕS-1, and MϕS-39 reacted with antigens found at high densities on up to 94% of phagocyte cells in purified blood monocyte preparations and on the vast majority of fluid or tissue macrophages. The reagent MϕP-15 recognized an antigen expressed at intermediate density on an average of 70% of blood monocytes and at greater density on almost all fluid and tissue macrophages. The reagents MϕP-7 and MϕR-17 detected antigens that were present at very low densities on 36% or less of blood monocytes but in larger quantities on almost all fluid or tissue macrophages; small amounts of these two antigens were also identified on a subpopulation of T cell blasts but not on resting T cells. The distribution and characteristics of the antigens recognized by the latter three reagents suggest they appear in sequence on the more mature members of the lineage MoPh and that their pattern of expression on blood monocytes defines three subsets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Establishment of a human cell line (mono mac 6) with characteristics of mature monocytes
Ziegler‐Heitbroc, H. W. L., Thiel, E., Futterer, A., Herzog, V., Wirtz, A., & Riethmüller, G. (1988) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910410324 · Cited by 553
Specific Tropism of HIV-1 for Microglial Cells in Primary Human Brain Cultures
Watkins, B. A., Dorn, H. H., Kelly, W. B., Armstrong, R. C., Potts, A. J., Michaels, F., Kufta, C. V., & Dubois-Dalcq, M. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2200125 · Cited by 342
Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with an anti‐CD4 monoclonal antibody
Horneff, G., Burmester, G. R., Emmrich, F., & Kalden, J. R. (1991) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780340202 · Cited by 275
Self-citationHaynes, B. F., Martin, M. E., Kay, H. H., & Kurtzberg, J. (1988) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.168.3.1061 · Cited by 269
Geng, Y. J., & Hansson, G. K. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci115718 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimitriu-Bona, A., Burmester, G. R., Waters, S. J., & Winchester, R. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983-01-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-152
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2098643663
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human mononuclear phagocyte differentiation antigens. I. Patterns of antigenic expression on the surface of human monocytes and macrophages defined by monoclonal antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.130.1.145
- The paper
- Dimitriu-Bona, A., Burmester, G. R., Waters, S. J., & Winchester, R. J. (1983). Human mononuclear phagocyte differentiation antigens. I. Patterns of antigenic expression on the surface of human monocytes and macrophages defined by monoclonal antibodies. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.130.1.145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.