The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Activation of mouse peritoneal macrophages in vitro and in vivo by interferon-gamma.
Abstract
To determine the role of IFN-gamma in the activation of resident mouse peritoneal macrophages, crude macrophage-activating lymphokines were incubated with a monoclonal anti-murine IFN-gamma antibody. This treatment abolished the capacity of mitogen-induced lymphokines to enhance either H2O2 release or activity against the intracellular protozoa Toxoplasma gondii and Leishmania donovani. All macrophage-activating factor detected by these assays was also removed by passing the lymphokines over a Sepharose column to which the monoclonal anti-IFN-gamma antibody had been coupled. Therefore, pure murine rIFN-gamma was tested both in vitro and in vivo as a single activating agent. After 48 hr of pretreatment in vitro with 0.01 to 1 antiviral U/ml, macrophage H2O2-releasing capacity was enhanced an average of 6.4-fold; half-maximal stimulation was induced by 0.03 U/ml. Resident macrophages infected with T. gondii half-maximally inhibited parasite replication after 24 hr of preincubation with 0.14 U/ml of rIFN-gamma, and near complete inhibition was achieved by pretreatment with 100 U/ml. Half-maximal leishmanicidal activity was induced by 0.08 U/ml of rIFN-gamma, and 67 to 75% of intracellular L. donovani amastigotes were killed after macrophages were preincubated with 10 to 100 U/ml. Eighteen hours after parenteral injection of rIFN-gamma, peritoneal macrophages displayed a dose-dependent enhancement of H2O2-releasing capacity and antiprotozoal activity. Half-maximal enhancement required 85 to 250 U or rIFN-gamma given i.p. Peritoneal macrophages were also activated by rIFN-gamma injected i.v. and intramuscularly. These results suggest that, in the mouse model, IFN-gamma is likely to be a primary factor within mitogen-induced lymphokines responsible for activating macrophage oxidative metabolism and antiprotozoal activity, and indicate that rIFN-gamma is a potent activator of these effector functions both in vitro and in vivo. These findings provide a rationale for evaluating rIFN-gamma in the treatment of systemic intracellular infections, and indicate that murine models are appropriate for such studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mosmann, T. R., & Coffman, R. L. (1989) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.07.040189.001045 · Cited by 7,692
Johnston, R. B. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198803243181205 · Cited by 699
Drapier, J. C., Pellat, C., & Henry, Y. (1991) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99204-5 · Cited by 279
Proteolytic inactivation of cytokines by Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Parmely, M., Gale, A., Clabaugh, M., Horvat, R., & Zhou, W. W. (1990) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.58.9.3009-3014.1990 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, H. W., Spitalny, G. L., & Nathan, C. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-03-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1619-1622
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1599436637
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activation of mouse peritoneal macrophages in vitro and in vivo by interferon-gamma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.134.3.1619
- The paper
- Murray, H. W., Spitalny, G. L., & Nathan, C. F. (1985). Activation of mouse peritoneal macrophages in vitro and in vivo by interferon-gamma. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.134.3.1619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.