Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antibody binding to CD5 (Tp67) and Tp44 T cell surface molecules: effects on cyclic nucleotides, cytoplasmic free calcium, and cAMP-mediated suppression.

Ledbetter, J A, Parsons, M, Martin, P J, Hansen, J A, Rabinovitch, P S, June, C H·1986·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

T cells can be activated to proliferate by antibodies to the T cell antigen receptor or the molecularly associated CD3 complex if monocytes are present. We have shown previously that monoclonal antibodies to the human T cell differentiation antigens CD5 (Tp67) and Tp44 each augment and prolong proliferative responses of anti-CD3-activated T cells, even in the absence of monocytes. Here we show that the functional and biochemical mechanisms of CD5 and Tp44 signal transmission are distinct. T cell proliferation is suppressed by agents that increase the concentration of intracellular cAMP. We found that antibody binding to the Tp44 surface molecule overcomes this suppression, whereas antibody binding to CD5 does not, indicating that ligand-Tp44 interaction changes T cell sensitivity to cAMP-mediated growth inhibition. The ability of anti-CD3, anti-Tp44, and anti-CD5 monoclonal antibodies to directly alter cyclic nucleotide levels in the Jurkat T cell line was examined. Anti-CD3 alone caused a rapid four- to sixfold increase in cAMP levels, but did not affect cGMP levels. However, anti-Tp44 and anti-CD5 each caused a rapid three- to fourfold increase in cGMP levels without affecting cAMP levels. In other experiments, cytoplasmic free calcium levels were measured in resting T cells after CD5 or Tp44 stimulation by using the dye indo-1 and flow cytometry. This sensitive method showed that anti-CD5 alone caused an increase in cytoplasmic calcium free levels within 3 min of antibody addition, whereas anti-Tp44 had no effect. Finally, anti-Tp44 and IL 1 each augmented proliferation of phorbol ester-stimulated lymphocytes, whereas anti-CD5 did not. The effects of IL 1 and Tp44 could be further distinguished in that the effect of anti-Tp44 was resistant to inhibition by dBcAMP whereas IL 1 was not. These data suggest that the receptor function of both Tp44 and CD5 involves changes in cyclic nucleotides levels, and that the mechanism by which anti-Tp44 and anti-CD5 antibodies affect T cell proliferative responses may be related to their selective effects on cGMP levels and cytoplasmic calcium concentrations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.137.10.3299

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Ledbetter, J. A., Parsons, M., Martin, P. J., Hansen, J. A., Rabinovitch, P. S., & June, C. H.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1986-11
Volume
137
Issue
10
Pages
3299-3305
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2116410045
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibody binding to CD5 (Tp67) and Tp44 T cell surface molecules: effects on cyclic nucleotides, cytoplasmic free calcium, and cAMP-mediated suppression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.137.10.3299
The paper
Ledbetter, J. A., Parsons, M., Martin, P. J., Hansen, J. A., Rabinovitch, P. S., & June, C. H. (1986). Antibody binding to CD5 (Tp67) and Tp44 T cell surface molecules: effects on cyclic nucleotides, cytoplasmic free calcium, and cAMP-mediated suppression. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.137.10.3299

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.