The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization and affinity isolation of xenoreactive human natural antibodies.
Abstract
Natural Abs, which are thought to provide an initial defense against invasive microorganisms, include isohemagglutinins, anti-phosphatidylcholine Abs, and anti-alpha-galactose Abs. We have evaluated the physiologic properties of the fraction of human natural Abs that bind to porcine endothelial cells and that would, as a result, initiate the rejection of a porcine organ transplanted into a human. The concentration of xenoreactive IgM in the serum varied widely in the population (5 to 105 micrograms/ml), but was highly dependent on the concentration of IgM in the serum (r = 0.85). Despite this variation and the potential diversity of epitopes recognized, human xenoreactive natural Abs exhibited surprisingly homogeneous binding characteristics, both in one individual and in the population. The apparent avidity determined by using a direct ELISA yielded a functional dissociation constant of 10(-8) M to 10(-10) M, depending on the temperature used. This high functional Kd apparently results from polyvalent interactions between the IgM and the porcine cell surface. Although the xenoreactive IgMs were absorbed by structurally diverse molecules such as ssDNA and thyroglobulin, about 80% of the xenoreactive Abs were specific for the terminal alpha-galactose determinant. A method was developed for affinity isolation of xenoreactive natural Abs by using a thermal extraction procedure. The method quantitatively accounts for all xenoreactive IgM, yielding functional IgM as evidenced by Ag binding and complement activation. Given the overlapping specificity of xenoreactive Abs in the population and the homogeneity of the functional Kd, the natural humoral immunologic barrier to xenotransplantation may be far less formidable than previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Selective Tumor Cell Targeting Using Low-Affinity, Multivalent Interactions
Carlson, C. B., Mowery, P., Owen, R. M., Dykhuizen, E. C., & Kiessling, L. L. (2007) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb6003788 · Cited by 270
Transplanting organs from pigs to humans
Sykes, M., & Sachs, D. H. (2019) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aau6298 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, W., Bruno, D., Holzknecht, Z. E., & Platt, J. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3791-3803
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1533481657
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization and affinity isolation of xenoreactive human natural antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.153.8.3791
- The paper
- Parker, W., Bruno, D., Holzknecht, Z. E., & Platt, J. L. (1994). Characterization and affinity isolation of xenoreactive human natural antibodies. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.153.8.3791
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.