The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective Tumor Cell Targeting Using Low-Affinity, Multivalent Interactions
Abstract
This report highlights the advantages of low-affinity, multivalent interactions to recognize one cell type over another. Our goal was to devise a strategy to mediate selective killing of tumor cells, which are often distinguished from normal cells by their higher levels of particular cell surface receptors. To test whether multivalent interactions could lead to highly specific cell targeting, we used a chemically synthesized small-molecule ligand composed of two distinct motifs: (1) an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptidomimetic that binds tightly (Kd approximately 10(-9)M) to alphavbeta3 integrins and (2) the galactosyl-alpha(1-3)galactose (alpha-Gal epitope), which is recognized by human anti-alpha-galactosyl antibodies (anti-Gal). Importantly, anti-Gal binding requires a multivalent presentation of carbohydrate residues; anti-Gal antibodies interact weakly with the monovalent oligosaccharide (Kd approximately 10(-5)M) but bind tightly (Kd approximately 10(-11) M) to multivalent displays of alpha-Gal epitopes. Such a display is generated when the bifunctional conjugate decorates a cell possessing a high level of alphavbeta3 integrin; the resulting cell surface, which presents many alpha-Gal epitopes, can recruit anti-Gal, thereby triggering complement-mediated lysis. Only those cells with high levels of the integrin receptor are killed. In contrast, doxorubicin tethered to the RGD-based ligand affords indiscriminate cell death. These results highlight the advantages of exploiting the type of the multivalent recognition processes used by physiological systems to discriminate between cells. The selectivity of this strategy is superior to traditional, abiotic, high-affinity targeting methods. Our results have implications for the treatment of cancer and other diseases characterized by the presence of deleterious cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mosmann, T. (1983) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 · Cited by 56,104
Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion
Hynes, R. O. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90115-s · Cited by 9,859
New Perspectives in Cell Adhesion: RGD and Integrins
Ruoslahti, E., & Pierschbacher, M. D. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2821619 · Cited by 4,865
Mammen, M., Choi, S.-K., & Whitesides, G. M. (1998) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2754::aid-anie2754>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 4,110
Giancotti, F. G., & Ruoslahti, E. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5430.1028 · Cited by 3,869
Integrins and Signal Transduction Pathways: the Road Taken
Clark, E. A., & Brugge, J. S. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7716514 · Cited by 2,937
Integrin αvβ3 antagonists promote tumor regression by inducing apoptosis of angiogenic blood vessels
Brooks, P. C., Montgomery, A. M. P., Rosenfeld, M., Reisfeld, R. A., Hu, T., Klier, G., & Cheresh, D. A. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90007-8 · Cited by 2,262
Cancer Treatment by Targeted Drug Delivery to Tumor Vasculature in a Mouse Model
Arap, W., Pasqualini, R., & Ruoslahti, E. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5349.377 · Cited by 2,054
Xiong, J.-P., Stehle, T., Zhang, R., Joachimiak, A., Frech, M., Goodman, S. L., & Arnaout, M. A. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069040 · Cited by 1,613
Plow, E. F., Haas, T. A., Zhang, L., Loftus, J., & Smith, J. W. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r000003200 · Cited by 1,356
Cited by
Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer
Davis, M. E., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2614 · Cited by 4,233
Nanoparticle Size and Surface Chemistry Determine Serum Protein Adsorption and Macrophage Uptake
Walkey, C. D., Olsen, J. B., Guo, H., Emili, A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2084338 · Cited by 1,926
Block copolymer micelles in nanomedicine applications
Cabral, H., Miyata, K., Osada, K., & Kataoka, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00199 · Cited by 1,309
Biodegradable dendritic positron-emitting nanoprobes for the noninvasive imaging of angiogenesis
Almutairi, A., Rossin, R., Shokeen, M., Hagooly, A., Ananth, A., Capoccia, B., Guillaudeu, S., Abendschein, D., Anderson, C. J., Welch, M. J., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811757106 · Cited by 235
Unifying principles of bifunctional, proximity-inducing small molecules
Gerry, C. J., & Schreiber, S. L. (2020) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-020-0469-1 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, C. B., Mowery, P., Owen, R. M., Dykhuizen, E. C., & Kiessling, L. L.
- Venue
- ACS Chemical Biology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-01-26
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-127
- ISSN
- 1554-8929 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-8937
- OpenAlex
- W1971969520
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective Tumor Cell Targeting Using Low-Affinity, Multivalent Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cb6003788
- The paper
- Carlson, C. B., Mowery, P., Owen, R. M., Dykhuizen, E. C., & Kiessling, L. L. (2007). Selective Tumor Cell Targeting Using Low-Affinity, Multivalent Interactions. ACS Chemical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb6003788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.