Cited by 63Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeGlaucoma and retinal disordersDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity

Synergistic effect of rapamycin and cyclosporin A in the treatment of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis

Martin, D F, DeBarge, L R, Nussenblatt, R B, Chan, C C, Roberge, F G·1995·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Immunosuppressive drugs currently available for the treatment of autoimmune diseases display a narrow therapeutic window between efficacy and toxic side effects. The use of combinations of drugs that have a synergistic effect may expand this window and reduce the risk of toxicity. We evaluated the combination effect of rapamycin (Rapa) and cyclosporin A (CsA) in an autoimmune disease model of the eye. The dose-effect relationship of Rapa with CsA was measured in vitro on the inhibition of proliferation of retinal S-Ag-primed lymphocytes. A median effect analysis was performed and a combination index (CI) calculated for 50% inhibition of proliferation. Rapa and CsA were markedly synergistic over a wide dose range (lowest CI = 0.31). Calculated dose reduction factors indicated that Rapa could be reduced nine-fold and CsA reduced five-fold when these drugs were used in combination. These reduced doses were tested in vivo for the treatment of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU). Twelve of 15 rats treated with CsA, 2 mg/kg/day, developed EAU with a median severity of 2.5. Fourteen of 15 rats treated with Rapa, 0.01 mg/kg/day, developed EAU with a median severity of 3.25. Complete inhibition of EAU was achieved in all 15 animals treated with the combination of Rapa and CsA (combined vs CsA alone, p < 0.0002; combined vs Rapa alone, p < 0.00001). The demonstrated synergistic relationship between Rapa and CsA will allow the use of reduced doses of each drug to achieve a therapeutic effect. The use of lower doses may reduce the toxicity of these drugs for the treatment of autoimmune uveitis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.154.2.922

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, D. F., DeBarge, L. R., Nussenblatt, R. B., Chan, C. C., & Roberge, F. G.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1995-01
Volume
154
Issue
2
Pages
922-927
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1497273491
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Keywords
rapamycin, cyclosporine, experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis, drug synergy, combination immunosuppressive therapy, autoimmune uveitis, dose reduction, combination index, mTOR inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Autoimmune Diseases, Drug Synergism, Eye Proteins, Immunosuppressive Agents, Lymph Nodes, Lymphocyte Activation, Male, Polyenes, Rats, Inbred Lew, Retinitis, Uveitis, Cyclosporine, Arrestin, Sirolimus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review