The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inhibition of human complement by a C3-binding peptide isolated from a phage-displayed random peptide library
Abstract
We have screened a phage-displayed random peptide library for binding to C3b, the proteolytically activated form of complement component C3, and have identified a novel peptide that suppresses complement activation. This phage-displayed peptide bound to C3, C3b, and C3c, but not to C3d, indicating that it binds to the C3c region of C3. A synthetic 27-amino acid peptide corresponding to the phage-displayed peptide also bound to C3 and C3 fragments and inhibited both the classical and alternative pathways of complement activation. The inhibition of complement activation was reversible. Studies with overlapping peptides indicated that the functional activity was located in the cyclic 13-amino acid N-terminal region (ICVVQDWGHHRCT) of the parent peptide. Reduction and alkylation of this 13-residue synthetic peptide destroyed its inhibitory activity. Analysis of the mechanism of inhibition revealed that the peptide inhibited C3 cleavage in normal human serum as well as when the alternative pathway was reconstituted with purified complement components, and the observed inhibition was not due to sterically hindered access to the C3a/C3b cleavage site. Further, the peptide did not inhibit the cleavage of factor B, indicating that it did not affect the interaction of CA with factor B or the formation of C3b,Bb. The peptide also had no effect on the binding of properdin to C3, demonstrating that the observed inhibition of C3 cleavage in normal human serum was not due in part to its effect on the properdin-stabilized C3 convertase, C3b,Bb,P. These results indicate that the peptide we have identified interacts with C3 to inhibit its activation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current understanding of periodontal disease pathogenesis and targets for host‐modulation therapy
Hajishengallis, G., Chavakis, T., & Lambris, J. D. (2020) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12331 · Cited by 502
Self-citationRitis, K., Doumas, M., Mastellos, D., Micheli, A., Giaglis, S., Magotti, P., Rafail, S., Kartalis, G., Sideras, P., & Lambris, J. D. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.7.4794 · Cited by 489
Self-citationComplement component C3 – The “Swiss Army Knife” of innate immunity and host defense
Ricklin, D., Reis, E. S., Mastellos, D. C., Gros, P., & Lambris, J. D. (2016) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12500 · Cited by 484
Self-citationComplement-targeted therapeutics
Ricklin, D., & Lambris, J. D. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1342 · Cited by 481
Self-citationMollnes, T. E., Brekke, O., Fung, M. S. C., Fure, H., Christiansen, D., Bergseth, G., Videm, V., Lappegård, K. T., Köhl, J., & Lambris, J. D. (2002) · PubMed · doi:10.1182/blood.v100.5.1869.h81702001869_1869_1877 · Cited by 455
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sahu, A., Kay, B. K., & Lambris, J. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 884-891
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1489377217
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of human complement by a C3-binding peptide isolated from a phage-displayed random peptide library. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.157.2.884
- The paper
- Sahu, A., Kay, B. K., & Lambris, J. D. (1996). Inhibition of human complement by a C3-binding peptide isolated from a phage-displayed random peptide library. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.157.2.884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.