Cited by 450vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Defective ribosomal products (DRiPs): a major source of antigenic peptides for MHC class I molecules?

Yewdell, J W, Antón, L C, Bennink, J R·1996·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

MHC class I molecules predominantly bind to peptides derived from a cytosolic pool of polypeptides. Little is known about the nature of the polypeptides that serve as substrates for peptidogenic cytosolic proteases. We propose that a significant source of self and viral peptides are defective ribosomal products (DRiPs), which consist of prematurely terminated polypeptides and misfolded polypeptides produced from translation of bona fide mRNAs in the proper reading frame. DRiPs are produced entropically, due to the inevitable imperfections inherent to protein synthesis or folding. To accelerate recognition of cells harboring intracellular parasites such as viruses, DRiP formation may be enhanced by changes in the cellular physiology induced by infection or by exposure of cells to cytokines released at the site of inflammation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.157.5.1823

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observations that MHC epitope density correlates with intracellular protein and that epitope production occurs without detectable full-length protein are not contradictory and may be explained by defective ribosomal products (DriPs) being quickly processed into peptides and contributing significantly to MHC-associated epitopes.

    “These observations are not contradictory but may be explained by the fact that in addition to steady state protein levels, defective ribosomal products (DriPs) such as unfinished or misfolded proteins are quickly processed into peptides and contribute significantly to MHC-associated epitopes.49”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yewdell, J. W., Antón, L. C., & Bennink, J. R.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1996-09-01
Volume
157
Issue
5
Pages
1823-1826
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1925735392
Cited by
450
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
defective ribosomal products, MHC class I, antigenic peptides, cytosolic proteases, early termination, misfolded proteins, viral peptides, self-peptides, intracellular parasites, cytokines, inflammation, immune recognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Humans, Peptide Biosynthesis, Peptides, Ribosomal Proteins, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Antigen Presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review