Cited by 161Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactionsinterferon and immune responsesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

IL-4-induced STAT6 suppresses IFN-gamma-stimulated STAT1-dependent transcription in mouse macrophages

Ohmori, Y, Hamilton, T A·1997·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

IL-4 suppresses the IFN-gamma-induced expression of the IFN regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) gene, and this suppression is attenuated by increasing the amount of IFN-gamma. The effects of IFN-gamma and IL-4 on transcription of a reporter gene under control of a 1.3-kb fragment from the IRF-1 gene promoter or the STAT binding element (SBE) from this gene in the context of a heterologous promoter are similar to their effects on the endogenous IRF-1 gene. IFN-gamma-dependent transcription of reporter gene is suppressed by IL-4, but IL-4 alone has no trans-activating function. IL-4 treatment does not inhibit the tyrosine phosphorylation or nuclear translocation of IFN-gamma-activated STAT1. Rather, IFN-gamma and IL-4 independently activate STAT1 and STAT6, respectively, and both proteins bind to the IRF-1 SBE in homodimeric form. The affinity of STAT1 for the IRF-1 SBE is higher than the affinity of STAT6, as measured by competition with unlabeled oligonucleotide. These observations suggest that IL-4 may suppress IFN-gamma-stimulated transcription of the IRF-1 gene by activation of STAT6, which can compete with STAT1 for occupancy of the IRF-1 SBE when STAT1 levels are low. Suppression may be attenuated as the quantity of STAT1 relative to that of STAT6 increases in cells treated with increasing amounts of IFN-gamma and displaces STAT6.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.159.11.5474

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STAT1 and IRF5 are involved in M1 polarization/maintenance; STAT6, IRF4, CREB-C/EBPβ, and PPARγ are involved in M2 polarization/maintenance.

    “Specifically, STAT1 and IRF5 have been shown to be involved in polarization and maintenance of an M1 phenotype while STAT6, IRF4, CREB-C/EBPβ, and PPARγ are involved in polarization and maintenance of an M2 phenotype [23–30].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohmori, Y., & Hamilton, T. A.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1997-12-01
Volume
159
Issue
11
Pages
5474-5482
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2196799556
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA-39621, CA62220, P01CA062220, R01CA039621)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
IL-4, interferon-gamma, STAT6, STAT1, IRF1, transcriptional repression, macrophages, STAT1 nuclear translocation, tyrosine phosphorylation, cytokine signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, DNA-Binding Proteins, Interferon-gamma, Macrophages, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Trans-Activators, Interleukin-4, STAT1 Transcription Factor, STAT6 Transcription Factor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review