Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 436

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Developmental pathways of dendritic cells in vivo: distinct function, phenotype, and localization of dendritic cell subsets in FLT3 ligand-treated mice

Pulendran, B, Lingappa, J, Kennedy, M K, Smith, J, Teepe, M, Rudensky, A, Maliszewski, C R, Maraskovsky, E·1997·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

We have recently shown that Flt3 ligand administration dramatically increases dendritic cell (DC) numbers in various mouse tissues. This has enabled the identification of distinct mature DC subpopulations. These have been designated: population C (CD11c(bright) CD11b(bright)), D (CD11c(bright) CD11b(dull)), and E (CD11c(bright) CD11b(negative)) This report demonstrates that the mature DC subsets (C, D, and E) from Flt3 ligand-treated mice differ with respect to phenotype, geographic localization, and function. The myeloid Ags CD11b, F4/80, and Ly-6C are predominantly expressed by population C, but not D or E. In addition, a subset of population C-type DC expresses 33D1 and CD4. In contrast, DC within population D and E selectively express the lymphoid-related DC markers CD8alpha, DEC 205, CD1d, as well as CD23, elevated levels of CD117 (c-kit), CD24 (HSA), CD13, and CD54. Immunohistology indicates that the different DC subsets reside in distinct microenvironments, with populations D and E residing in the T cell areas of the white pulp, while DC within population C localize in the marginal zones. These DC subpopulations showed different capacities to phagocytose FITC-zymosan and to secrete IL-12 upon stimulation with Staphylococcus aureus cowan I strain + IFN-gamma + granulocyte-macrophage-CSF. Population C-type DC were more phagocytic but secreted little inducible IL-12 while population D- and E-type DC showed poor phagocytic capacity and secreted considerably higher levels of IL-12. These results underscore the importance of viewing DC development in vivo, as an interplay between distinct lineages and a maturational dependence on specific microenvironmental signals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.159.5.2222

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 436

Metadata

Authors
Pulendran, B., Lingappa, J., Kennedy, M. K., Smith, J., Teepe, M., Rudensky, A., Maliszewski, C. R., & Maraskovsky, E.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
159
Issue
5
Pages
2222-2231
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1545564541
Cited by
436
References
0
FWCI
10.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental pathways of dendritic cells in vivo: distinct function, phenotype, and localization of dendritic cell subsets in FLT3 ligand-treated mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.159.5.2222
The paper
Pulendran, B., Lingappa, J., Kennedy, M. K., Smith, J., Teepe, M., Rudensky, A., Maliszewski, C. R., & Maraskovsky, E. (1997). Developmental pathways of dendritic cells in vivo: distinct function, phenotype, and localization of dendritic cell subsets in FLT3 ligand-treated mice. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.159.5.2222

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.