Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mouse MD-1, a Molecule That Is Physically Associated with RP105 and Positively Regulates Its Expression

Miyake, Kensuke, Shimazu, Rintaro, Kondo, Jun, Niki, Tamotsu, Akashi, Sachiko, Ogata, Hirotaka, Yamashita, Yoshio, Miura, Yoshihiro, Kimoto, Masao·1998·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

RP105 is a leucine-rich repeat molecule that is expressed on mouse B cells and transmits a growth-promoting signal. An anti-RP105 Ab precipitated additional molecules as well as RP105. These molecules were found to be a mouse homologue of chicken MD-1. Chicken MD-1 was previously isolated as a v-myb-regulated gene, since its transcription increases rapidly after v-myb induction. Mouse MD-1, when transiently expressed as an epitope-tagged protein, is secreted in culture fluid but tethered to the cell surface by coexpressed RP105. An association of these molecules was confirmed by immunoprecipitation with the anti-RP105 Ab and subsequent probing of the epitope tag on MD-1. Moreover, MD-1 has an effect on the expression of RP105. In transient transfection of RP105, the percentage of RP105-positive cells increased more than twice with the coexpression of MD-1. The stable expression of MD-1 conferred approximately a sevenfold increase in cell surface RP105 on a cell line that expresses RP105 alone. Thus, MD-1 is physically associated with RP105 and is important for efficient cell surface expression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.161.3.1348

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 1994, Trends Biochem. Sci., 412
  2. 1994, Science, 789
  3. 1996, Cell, 451
  4. 1997, Science, 726
  5. 1996, Cell, 973
  6. 1997, Nature, 394
  7. 1994, J. Exp. Med., 1217
  8. 1996, J. Exp. Med., 113
  9. 1995, J. Immunol., 3333
  10. 1991, EMBO J., 3713
  11. 1985, Nucleic Acids Res., 1431
  12. 1992, J. Cell Biol., 653
  13. 1989, J. Immunol., 2796
  14. 1996, Science, 50
  15. 1996, Genomics, 299
  16. 1994, Nature, 563
  17. 1996, Genes Dev., 862
  18. 1995, Genes Dev., 1965

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miyake, K., Shimazu, R., Kondo, J., Niki, T., Akashi, S., Ogata, H., Yamashita, Y., Miura, Y., & Kimoto, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Immunology, Saga Medical School , Saga ,
  • Research and Development Division, Yokohama Research Center, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation , Kanagawa ,
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1998-08-01
Volume
161
Issue
3
Pages
1348-1353
ISSN
  • 0022-1767
  • 1550-6606
Cited by
126
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review