Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines Parallels Progression of Central Nervous System Pathology in Two Clinically Distinct Models of Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
Begolka, Wendy Smith, Vanderlugt, Carol L, Rahbe, Sandra M, Miller, Stephen D·1998·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is an immune-mediated demyelinating disease of unknown etiology that presents with either a chronic-progressive or relapsing-remitting clinical course. Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced demyelinating disease (TMEV-IDD) and relapsing-remitting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (R-EAE) in the SJL/J mouse are both relevant murine CD4+ T cell-mediated demyelinating models that recapitulate the multiple sclerosis disease phenotypes. To determine the cellular and molecular basis for these observed differences in clinical course, we quantitatively analyzed the temporal expression of pro- and antiinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression in the central nervous system (CNS) and the phenotype of the inflammatory mononuclear infiltrates. TMEV-infected SJL/J mice expressed IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-4 mRNA during the preclinical phase, and their levels continued to increase throughout the duration of the chronic-progressive disease course. These data correlated with the continued presence of both CD4+ T cells and F4/80+ macrophages within the CNS infiltrates. In contrast, SJL/J mice with PLP139–151-induced R-EAE displayed a biphasic pattern of CNS expression for the proinflammatory cytokines, IFN-γ and TNF-α, with expression peaking at the height of the acute phase and relapse(s). This pattern correlated with dynamic changes in the CD4+ T cell and F4/80+ macrophage populations during relapsing-remitting disease progression. Interestingly, IL-4 message was undetectable until disease remission(s), demonstrating its potential role in the intrinsic regulation of ongoing disease, whereas IL-10 was continuously expressed, arguing against a regulatory role in either disease. These data suggest that the kinetics of cytokine expression together with the nature of the persistent inflammatory infiltrates are major contributors to the differences in clinical course between TMEV-IDD and R-EAE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.161.8.4437

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Begolka, W. S., Vanderlugt, C. L., Rahbe, S. M., & Miller, S. D.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1998-10
Volume
161
Issue
8
Pages
4437-4446
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2152883511
Cited by
197
References
3
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines Parallels Progression of Central Nervous System Pathology in Two Clinically Distinct Models of Multiple Sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.161.8.4437
The paper
Begolka, W. S., Vanderlugt, C. L., Rahbe, S. M., & Miller, S. D. (1998). Differential Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines Parallels Progression of Central Nervous System Pathology in Two Clinically Distinct Models of Multiple Sclerosis. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.161.8.4437

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.