Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mice with a Selective Deletion of the CC Chemokine Receptors 5 or 2 Are Protected from Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Mediated Colitis: Lack of CC Chemokine Receptor 5 Expression Results in a NK1.1+ Lymphocyte-Associated Th2-Type Immune Response in the Intestine

Andres, Pietro G, Beck, Paul L, Mizoguchi, Emiko, Mizoguchi, Atsushi, Bhan, Atul K, Dawson, Tracey, Kuziel, William A, Maeda, Nobuyo, MacDermott, Richard P, Podolsky, Daniel K, Reinecker, Hans-Christian·2000·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5 and their respective ligands regulate leukocyte chemotaxis and activation. To determine the role of these chemokine receptors in the regulation of the intestinal immune response, we induced colitis in CCR2- and CCR5-deficient mice by continuous oral administration of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS). Both CCR2- and CCR5-deficient mice were susceptible to DSS-induced intestinal inflammation. The lack of CCR2 or CCR5 did not reduce the DSS-induced migration of macrophages into the colonic lamina propria. However, both CCR5-deficient mice and, to a lesser degree, CCR2-deficient mice were protected from DSS-induced intestinal adhesions and mucosal ulcerations. CCR5-deficient mice were characterized by a greater relative infiltration of CD4+ and NK1.1+ lymphocyte in the colonic lamina propria when compared to wild-type and CCR2-deficient mice. In CCR5-deficient mice, mucosal mRNA expression of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 was increased, whereas that of IFN-γ was decreased, corresponding to a Th2 pattern of T cell activation. In CCR2-deficient mice, the infiltration of Th2-type T cells in the lamina propria was absent, but increased levels of IL-10 and decreased levels of IFN-γ may have down regulated mucosal inflammation. Our data indicate that CCR5 may be critical for the promotion of intestinal Th1-type immune responses in mice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6303

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Andres, P. G., Beck, P. L., Mizoguchi, E., Mizoguchi, A., Bhan, A. K., Dawson, T., Kuziel, W. A., Maeda, N., MacDermott, R. P., Podolsky, D. K., & Reinecker, H.-C.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2000-06
Volume
164
Issue
12
Pages
6303-6312
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2156218775
Cited by
256
References
65
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mice with a Selective Deletion of the CC Chemokine Receptors 5 or 2 Are Protected from Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Mediated Colitis: Lack of CC Chemokine Receptor 5 Expression Results in a NK1.1+ Lymphocyte-Associated Th2-Type Immune Response in the Intestine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6303
The paper
Andres, P. G., Beck, P. L., Mizoguchi, E., Mizoguchi, A., Bhan, A. K., Dawson, T., Kuziel, W. A., Maeda, N., MacDermott, R. P., Podolsky, D. K., & Reinecker, H.-C. (2000). Mice with a Selective Deletion of the CC Chemokine Receptors 5 or 2 Are Protected from Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Mediated Colitis: Lack of CC Chemokine Receptor 5 Expression Results in a NK1.1+ Lymphocyte-Associated Th2-Type Immune Response in the Intestine. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.