Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diversity of Epitope and Cytokine Profiles for Primary and Secondary Influenza A Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses

Belz, Gabrielle T, Xie, Weidong, Doherty, Peter C·2001·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Screening with the flow cytometric IFN-γ assay has led to the identification of a new immunogenic peptide (SSYRRVPGI) from the influenza PB1 polymerase (PB1703–711) and a mimotope (ISPLMVAYM) from the PB2 polymerase (PB2198–206). CD8+ T cells specific for KbPB1703 make both IFN-γ and TNF-α following stimulation with both peptides. The CD8+ KbPB1703+ population kills PB2198-pulsed targets, but cell lines stimulated with PB2198 neither bind the KbPB1703 tetramer nor become CTL. This CD8+KbPB1703+ population is prominent in the primary response to an H3N2 virus, although it is much less obvious following secondary challenge of H1N1-primed mice. Even so, we can now account for >40% of the CD8+ T cells in a primary influenza pneumonia and >85% of those present after H3N2 → H1N1 challenge. Profiles of IFN-γ and TNF-α staining following in vitro stimulation have been traced for the four most prominent influenza peptides through primary and secondary responses into long-term memory. The DbNP366 epitope that is immunodominant after the H3N2 → H1N1 challenge shows the lowest frequencies of CD8+ IFN-γ+TNF-α+ cells for >6 wk, and the intensity of IFN-γ staining is also low for the first 3 wk. By 11 wk, however, the IFN-γ/TNF-α profiles look to be similar for all four epitopes. At least by the criterion of cytokine production, there is considerable epitope-related functional diversity in the influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cell response. The results for the KbPB1703 epitope and the PB2198 mimotope also provide a cautionary tale for those using the cytokine staining approach to identity antigenic peptides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.166.7.4627

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Phenotypic Analysis of Antigen-Specific T Lymphocytes

    Altman, J. D., Moss, P. A. H., Goulder, P. J. R., Barouch, D. H., McHeyzer-Williams, M. G., Bell, J. I., McMichael, A. J., & Davis, M. M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5284.94 · Cited by 3,544 · cited 1×

    “Virus-specific CD8(1) T cells were identified using tetrameric complexes (1, 3, 7) of the H-2D glycoprotein and peptides derived from the NP AS NENMETM (5) and polymerase 2 protein (PA) SSLENFRAYV, or H2K 1 SSYRRPVGI from PB1.”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Belz, G. T., Xie, W., & Doherty, P. C.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
166
Issue
7
Pages
4627-4633
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1962164504
Cited by
203
References
1
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity of Epitope and Cytokine Profiles for Primary and Secondary Influenza A Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.166.7.4627
The paper
Belz, G. T., Xie, W., & Doherty, P. C. (2001). Diversity of Epitope and Cytokine Profiles for Primary and Secondary Influenza A Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.166.7.4627

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.