Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Veto-Like Activity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Functional Discrimination Between Cellular Responses to Alloantigens and Recall Antigens

Potian, Julius A, Aviv, Hana, Ponzio, Nicholas M, Harrison, Jonathan S, Rameshwar, Pranela·2003·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Trans-differentiation of stem cells shows promise for use in tissue repair medicine. Although poorly defined, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) appear useful for applications in repair medicine. Despite the low frequency of MSC, they are relatively easy to expand. The expression of MHC class II on MSC, however, could deter their use in repair medicine, since these molecules could stimulate an allogeneic host response. This study sought to compare the immune stimulatory and suppressive effects of MSC. Primary human MSC were cultured from bone marrow aspirates and then passaged at least three times before use in assays. Morphologically, MSC were symmetrical; were SH2+, MHC class II+, CD45−, CD44+, CD31−, CD14−, proly-4-hydroxylase−; and showed normal karyotype patterns and elevated telomerase activities. MSC elicited significant stimulatory responses when cocultured with allogeneic PBMC. Despite the production of different types of growth factors, allogeneic effects of MSC could not be explained by the production of these growth factors. One-way MLR reactions were significantly blunted by third-party MSC. Similar suppression was not observed for responses to three different recall Ags. Based on these functional differences by MSC in responses to allo- and recall Ags, we examined whether MSC could exert veto-like functions. We showed that MSC could blunt the cytotoxic effects of allogeneic-induced effectors to mitogen-activated targets. The results showed that although MSC elicited allogeneic responses in a model that mimics a graft-vs-host reaction, they also exerted veto-like activity, but caused no effect on responses to recall Ags.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3426

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Potian, J. A., Aviv, H., Ponzio, N. M., Harrison, J. S., & Rameshwar, P.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
171
Issue
7
Pages
3426-3434
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2150977474
Cited by
432
References
38
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Veto-Like Activity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Functional Discrimination Between Cellular Responses to Alloantigens and Recall Antigens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3426
The paper
Potian, J. A., Aviv, H., Ponzio, N. M., Harrison, J. S., & Rameshwar, P. (2003). Veto-Like Activity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Functional Discrimination Between Cellular Responses to Alloantigens and Recall Antigens. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3426

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.