Cited by 158T-cell and B-cell ImmunologySepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentImmune Response and Inflammation

Human CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Lymphocytes Inhibit Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Monocyte Survival through a Fas/Fas Ligand-Dependent Mechanism

Open access
Venet, Fabienne, Pachot, Alexandre, Debard, Anne-Lise, Bohe, Julien, Bienvenu, Jacques, Lepape, Alain, Powell, William S, Monneret, Guillaume·2006·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Although it is known that septic shock induces immunosuppression, the mechanism for this phenomenon is not well understood. Monocytes play a central role in septic shock pathophysiology, which is also characterized by an increased proportion of natural regulatory T (Treg) cells. We therefore investigated whether Treg could be involved in the decreased monocyte expression of CD14 and HLA-DR observed during septic shock. We demonstrated that human Treg inhibit LPS-induced retention of monocyte CD14. Because loss of CD14 is a hallmark of monocyte apoptosis, this suggests that Treg inhibit monocyte survival. This effect was largely mediated through the release of a soluble mediator that was not identical with either IL-10 or IL-4. The Fas/FasL pathway participated in the effect as it was blocked by anti-FasL Abs and reproduced by Fas agonist and recombinant soluble FasL. Furthermore, expression of FasL was much higher on Treg than on their CD25− counterparts. Collectively, these results indicate that Treg act on monocytes by inhibiting their LPS-induced survival through a proapoptotic mechanism involving the Fas/FasL pathway. This may be an important mechanism for septic shock-induced immunosuppression and may offer new perspectives for the treatment of this deadly disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6540

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venet, F., Pachot, A., Debard, A.-L., Bohe, J., Bienvenu, J., Lepape, A., Powell, W. S., & Monneret, G.
Affiliations
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • Intensive Care Units, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Pierre-Bénite ,
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Venet, Fabienne
  • Monneret, Guillaume
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
177
Issue
9
Pages
6540-6547
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2146065571
Cited by
158
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
regulatory T cells, CD4+CD25+ T cells, septic shock, immunosuppression, monocyte survival, monocyte apoptosis, lipopolysaccharide, Fas/Fas ligand pathway, CD14, HLA-DR, soluble Fas ligand
MeSH terms
Cell Survival, Female, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Middle Aged, Monocytes, Shock, Septic, CD4 Antigens, Interleukin-4, Interleukin-10, Lipopolysaccharide Receptors, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Fas Ligand Protein, Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review