Cited by 133

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tubulation of Class II MHC Compartments Is Microtubule Dependent and Involves Multiple Endolysosomal Membrane Proteins in Primary Dendritic Cells

Vyas, Jatin M, Kim, You-Me, Artavanis-Tsakonas, Katerina, Love, J Christopher, Van der Veen, Annemarthe G, Ploegh, Hidde L·2007·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Immature dendritic cells (DCs) capture exogenous Ags in the periphery for eventual processing in endolysosomes. Upon maturation by TLR agonists, DCs deliver peptide-loaded class II MHC molecules from these compartments to the cell surface via long tubular structures (endolysosomal tubules). The nature and rules that govern the movement of these DC compartments are unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that the tubules contain multiple proteins including the class II MHC molecules and LAMP1, a lysosomal resident protein, as well as CD63 and CD82, members of the tetraspanin family. Endolysosomal tubules can be stained with acidotropic dyes, indicating that they are extensions of lysosomes. However, the proper trafficking of class II MHC molecules themselves is not necessary for endolysosomal tubule formation. DCs lacking MyD88 can also form endolysosomal tubules, demonstrating that MyD88-dependent TLR activation is not necessary for the formation of this compartment. Endolysosomal tubules in DCs exhibit dynamic and saltatory movement, including bidirectional travel. Measured velocities are consistent with motor-based movement along microtubules. Indeed, nocodazole causes the collapse of endolysosomal tubules. In addition to its association with microtubules, endolysosomal tubules follow the plus ends of microtubules as visualized in primary DCs expressing end binding protein 1 (EB1)-enhanced GFP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7199

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kinesin-dependent tubulation of lysosomes is required for efficient MHCII-mediated antigen presentation in dendritic cells.

    “kinesin-dependent tubulation of lysosomes is required for efficient MHCII-mediated antigen presentation in dendritic cells16–18.”

    From TFEB regulates lysosomal positioning by modulating TMEM55B expression and JIP4 recruitment to lysosomes (2017) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that endolysosomal tubules carry class II MHC molecules toward the cell surface and depend on microtubules. It says kinesin is a possible motor but that direct evidence is lacking. The paper also does not establish that tubulation is required for efficient MHCII-mediated antigen presentation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 2004, Trends Cell Biol., 175
  2. 2006, Nat. Immunol., 1029
  3. 2005, Science, 1630
  4. 2003, Science, 1400
  5. 2004, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 96
  6. 2006, Nature, 808
  7. 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 19495
  8. 2002, Nature, 983
  9. 2002, Nature, 988
  10. 2003, J. Immunol., 4081
  11. 2006, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 476
  12. 2002, Nat. Immunol., 61
  13. 1994, J. Cell Biol., 1225
  14. 2002, Immunol. Rev., 136
  15. 1998, Eur. J. Immunol., 2605
  16. 2005, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 801
  17. 2002, Blood, 4039
  18. 1998, Blood, 1044
  19. 1998, Blood, 2313
  20. 1987, Blood, 838
  21. 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 1903
  22. 2001, Blood, 1142
  23. 2004, Science, 1153
  24. 2003, J. Immunol., 4479
  25. 2001, J. Immunol., 1452
  26. 1999, Curr. Biol., 1423
  27. 2003, Trends Cell Biol., 229
  28. 1990, J. Cell Biol., 1623
  29. 2005, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 316
  30. 2002, Mol. Biol. Cell, 4308
  31. 2003, J. Immunol., 5689
  32. 2001, J. Cell Biol., 53
  33. 2005, J. Cell Sci., 5243
  34. 2005, Traffic, 1093
  35. 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1584
  36. 2005, Eur. J. Immunol., 2552
  37. 1995, J. Exp. Med., 257
  38. 2004, Anal. Biochem., 247
  39. 2005, Trends Immunol., 72
  40. 1994, J. Cell Biol., 967
  41. 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2346
  42. 1996, J. Cell Biol., 611
  43. 2002, Traffic, 894
  44. 2006, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 3
  45. 2002, J. Immunol., 2872
  46. 2004, Trends Microbiol., 44
  47. 2001, J. Immunol., 4620
  48. 1990, Nature, 864
  49. 2004, Nat. Immunol., 190
  50. 2006, J. Cell Biol., 767
  51. 2006, EMBO J., 3934
  52. 2001, EMBO J., 683
  53. 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell, 467
  54. 2002, EMBO J., 1289
  55. 2001, Curr. Biol., 1680
  56. 2003, Mol. Cell. Biol., 6494
  57. 2003, Ann. Rev. Immunol., 335
  58. 2001, J. Immunol., 5688

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vyas, J. M., Kim, Y.-M., Artavanis-Tsakonas, K., Love, J. C., Van der Veen, A. G., & Ploegh, H. L.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
178
Issue
11
Pages
7199-7210
ISSN
  • 0022-1767
  • 1550-6606
Cited by
133
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review