CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsSocial Policies and Family

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Understanding the long term effects of family policies on fertility: The diffusion of different family models in France and Germany

Open access
Salles, Anne, Rossier, Clémentine, Brachet, Sara·2010·Demographic Research
DOI 10.4054/demres.2010.22.34
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

European countries in which mothers are encouraged to remain in the labour market have higher fertility levels. It is difficult, however, to link specific policies to fertility increases. We hypothesize that policy changes do not affect fertility decis

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4054/demres.2010.22.34

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In qualitative studies, participants' narratives of their obstacles to fertility include financial considerations (cost of children and cost of childcare), job stability, housing, work-family conflict, and gender equality.

    “This includes financial considerations (cost of children and cost of childcare), job stability, housing, workfamily conflict, and gender equality.”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Salles, Rossier, and Brachet 2010

    The interviews report financial sacrifices associated with children (section 4.1 and Discussion), childcare costs and a jobless father's financial situation as considerations in having another child (section 4.2). They also describe difficulties combining work and family (section 4.2) and unequal parental tasks (section 5.2.1). The passages do not establish housing or job stability as obstacles reported by participants; employment and finances are discussed, but not job stability specifically. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. 10.1300/J002v39n03_02 · DOI
  2. Dearing, 2007, Fiscal Studies, 28, 463, 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00064.x · DOI
  3. Dorbritz, 2005, Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 4, 359
  4. 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.17 · DOI
  5. Dorbritz, 1997, Einstellungen zur Familienpolitik in Europa. Ergebnisse eines vergleichenden Surveys in den Ländern des European Comparative Survey on Population Policy Acceptance (PPA)
  6. Dorbritz, 2005, Einstellungen zu demografischen Trends und zu bevölkerungsrelevanten Politiken. Ergebnisse der PPA Study in Deutschland
  7. 10.2307/3246636 · DOI
  8. Esping-Andersen, 1990, The three worlds of welfare capitalism
  9. Ette, 2007, Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 1-2, 51
  10. Fagnani, 1992, Revue française des affaires sociales, 2, 129
  11. Fagnani, 2000, Un travail et des enfants. Petits arbitrages et grands dilemmes
  12. 10.1080/13668800601110736 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/1366880022010218 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0195-6310(07)00002-6 · DOI
  15. Fagnani, 2009, Comparaison européenne des aides aux familles
  16. Gauthier, 1996, The State and the family. A comparative analysis of family policies in industrialized countries, 10.1093/oso/9780198288046.001.0001 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1023/B:POPU.0000020962.80895.4a · DOI
  19. 10.1177/095892879700700103 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00584.x · DOI
  21. Hantrais, 2004, Family policy matters: Responding to family change in Europe
  22. 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.39 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/095892879600600201 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/000169939303600202 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/0032472031000143846 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/0363199008323356 · DOI
  27. Huinink, 2002, Elternschaft heute. Gesellschaftliche Rahmenbedingungen und individuelle Gestaltungsaufgaben, 49
  28. 10.1177/0958928707078367 · DOI
  29. Kaufmann, 2002, Family Life and Family Policies in Europe, 10.1093/oso/9780198233282.001.0001 · DOI
  30. 10.4054/DemRes.2006.14.14 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/3246612 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/0032472031000146456 · DOI
  33. Becker, 1981, A Treatise on the family
  34. 10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.2 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1023/A:1026556309080 · DOI
  36. 10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.18 · DOI
  37. Lengerer, 2004, Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 1, 99
  38. 10.3917/inno.020.0059 · DOI
  39. Lewis, 1995, European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, 159
  40. Luci, 2010, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 56, 3, 10.1515/zsr-2010-0102 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00134.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.29 · DOI
  43. 10.1177/0958928707084453 · DOI
  44. 10.1177/2345678906292238 · DOI
  45. Neyer, 2003, Journal of Population and Social Security (Population), 1, 46
  46. Onnen-Isemann, 2003, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B44, 31
  47. 10.3917/reof.090.0225 · DOI
  48. Pinl, 2003, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B44, 6
  49. 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.56 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s10680-009-9203-0 · DOI
  51. 10.3917/inno.020.0093 · DOI
  52. 10.3917/crii.031.0095 · DOI
  53. 10.1300/J002v39n03_04 · DOI
  54. 10.1007/s10680-007-9127-5 · DOI
  55. Schroder, 2008, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37, 117, 10.1515/zfsoz-2008-0202 · DOI
  56. 10.1177/0958928704042003 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s11113-008-9086-5 · DOI
  58. Strohmeier, 2002, Familienpolitik und Familienstrukturen, 109
  59. 10.1553/populationyearbook2007s357 · DOI
  60. 10.3917/pope.601.0099 · DOI
  61. Thévenon, 2008, Does fertility respond to work and family-life reconciliation policies in France?
  62. Toulemon, 2006, Fertility Among Immigrant Women and Men in France: New Data, New Approach
  63. 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.16 · DOI
  64. 10.1177/0958928708091060 · DOI
  65. 10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.27 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salles, A., Rossier, C., & Brachet, S.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
  • Institut national d'études démographiques (FR)
ORCID
Rossier, Clémentine
Venue
Demographic Research
Publisher
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
Published
2010-06-22
Volume
22
Pages
1057-1096
ISSN
1435-9871 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.4054/demres.2010.22.34
OpenAlex
W2079427560
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Demographic Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archined (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
Keywords
family policy, fertility, policy diffusion, family models, long-term policy effects, France, Germany, comparative policy analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review