Cited by 31Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

The Importance of GLWamide Neuropeptides in Cnidarian Development and Physiology

Open access
Takahashi, Toshio, Hatta, Masayuki·2011·Journal of Amino Acids

Abstract

The peptide-signaling molecules (<50 amino acid residues) occur in a wide variety of invertebrate and vertebrate organisms, playing pivotal roles in physiological, endocrine, and developmental processes. While some of these peptides display similar structures in mammals and invertebrates, others differ with respect to their structure and function in a species-specific manner. Such a conservation of basic structure and function implies that many peptide-signaling molecules arose very early in the evolutionary history of some taxa, while species-specific characteristics led us to suggest that they also acquire the ability to evolve in response to specific environmental conditions. In this paper, we describe GLWamide-family peptides that function as signaling molecules in the process of muscle contraction, metamorphosis, and settlement in cnidarians. The peptides are produced by neurons and are therefore referred to as neuropeptides. We discuss the importance of the neuropeptides in both developmental and physiological processes in a subset of hydrozoans, as well as the potential use as a seed compound in drug development and aspects related to the protection of corals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4061/2011/424501

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two smaller neuronal subpopulations expressing RFamide and GLWamide are primarily found in the oral half of the young polyp.

    “Two smaller neuronal subpopulations expressing specific neuropeptides, RFamide and GLWamide [30,31], are primarily found in the oral half of the young polyp.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, T., & Hatta, M.
Affiliations
  • Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences (JP)
  • Ochanomizu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Takahashi, Toshio
Venue
Journal of Amino Acids
Published
2011-10-20
Volume
2011
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 2090-0104 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-0112
OpenAlex
W2086410253
Cited by
31
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Amino Acids (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
neuropeptides, cnidarian development, Hydrozoa, peptide signaling, muscle contraction, metamorphosis, settlement, drug development, neuropeptide evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review