Cited by 199Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyObesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and Health

Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in 12,417 Male Veterans Aged 40 to 70 Years

Open access
McAuley, Paul A., Kokkinos, Peter F., Oliveira, Ricardo B., Emerson, Brian T., Myers, Jonathan N.·2010·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the influence of cardiorespiratory fitness (fitness) on the obesity paradox in middle-aged men with known or suspected coronary artery disease.Patients and methods This study consists of 12,417 men aged 40 to 70 years (44% African American) who were referred for exercise testing at the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in Washington, DC, or Palo Alto, CA (between January 1, 1983, and June 30, 2007). Fitness was quantified as metabolic equivalents achieved during a maximal exercise test and was categorized for analysis as low, moderate, and high (defined as <5, 5-10, and >10 metabolic equivalents, respectively). Adiposity was defined by body mass index (BMI) according to standard clinical guidelines. Separate and combined associations of fitness and adiposity with all-cause mortality were assessed by Cox proportional hazards analyses.Results We recorded 2801 deaths during a mean+/-SD follow-up of 7.7+/-5.3 years. Multivariate hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality, with normal weight (BMI, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) used as the reference group, were 1.9 (1.5-2.3), 0.7 (0.7-0.8), 0.7 (0.6-0.7), and 1.0 (0.8-1.1) for BMIs of less than 18.5, 25.0 to 29.9, 30.0 to 34.9, and 35.0 or more kg/m2, respectively. Compared with highly fit normal-weight men, underweight men with low fitness had the highest (4.5 [3.1-6.6]) and highly fit overweight men the lowest (0.4 [0.3-0.6]) mortality risk of any subgroup. Overweight and obese men with moderate fitness had mortality rates similar to those of the highly fit normal-weight reference group.Conclusion Fitness altered the obesity paradox. Overweight and obese men had increased longevity only if they registered high fitness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4065/mcp.2009.0562

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overweight and obese men with moderate cardiorespiratory fitness had mortality rates similar to those of the highly fit normal-weight reference group.

    “A study published since the above review essentially concurs with the review by its conclusion made from veterans population that overweight and obese men with moderate CRF fitness had mortality rates similar to those of the highly fit normal-weight reference group (334).”

    From Lack of Exercise Is a Major Cause of Chronic Diseases (2012) · cites this paper as [334]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 199

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO. Obesity and cardiovascular dis- ease: risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(21):1925-1932.

Authors
McAuley, P. A., Kokkinos, P. F., Oliveira, R. B., Emerson, B. T., & Myers, J. N.
Affiliations
  • Winston-Salem State University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University Gama Filho (BR)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
McAuley, Paul A.
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
115-121
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021185840
Cited by
199
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 24
FWCI
70.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK6 RX002477)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
obesity paradox, cardiorespiratory fitness, all-cause mortality, coronary artery disease, body mass index, overweight, obesity, underweight, metabolic equivalents, exercise testing, veterans, middle-aged men
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, California, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, District of Columbia, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Physical Fitness, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thinness, Veterans, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, Metabolic Equivalent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review