Cited by 241Antibiotic Use and ResistancePharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Self-medication patterns among medical students in South India

Open access
Badiger, Sanjeev·2012·Australasian Medical Journal

Abstract

Background Self-medication results in wastage of resources, increases resistance of pathogens and generally causes serious health hazards such as adverse drug reactions, prolonged suffering and drug dependence. This study was undertaken to determine the reasons for self-medication and the pattern of self-medication among medical students. Method This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at the K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore. The participants were medical students from first to final year. Medical students were selected through convenience sampling. The data was collected using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire. The data was analysed using SPSS version 16 and the results expressed as proportions. Results A total of 200 students, 121 (60.5%) female and 79 (39.5%) male, were included in the study. Of the medical students surveyed, self-medication was reported among 92%. The respondents who used self-medication found it to be time- saving in providing relief from minor ailments. The most common ailments for which self-medication were used were: the common cold (69%), fever (63%) and headache (60%). The students consulted their textbooks (39%) and seniors or classmates (38%) for the medications. Antipyretics (71%), analgesics (65%), antihistamines (37%) and antibiotics (34%) were the most common self- medicated drugs. Of the respondents, 33% were unaware of the adverse effects of the medication and 5% had experienced adverse reactions. The majority (64%)…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4066/amj.2012.1007

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badiger, S.
Affiliations
Nitte University (IN)
Corresponding author
Badiger, Sanjeev
Venue
Australasian Medical Journal
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
217-220
ISSN
1836-1935 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988046111
Cited by
218
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australasian Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
self-medication, medical students, antipyretics, analgesics, antihistamines, antibiotics, adverse drug reactions, drug awareness, common cold, fever, headache, drug addiction, South India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review