CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Decision Support System ApplicationsMulti-Criteria Decision MakingManagement and Optimization Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Definición de los Requerimientos de Información y Funciones para la Gestión de Mantenimiento Mediante un Proceso de Análisis Constructivo

Open access
Espinosa, Fernando F, Salinas, Gonzalo E·2015·Información tecnológica
DOI 10.4067/s0718-07642015000600009
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

ResumenEn este trabajo se presenta un procedimiento para formalizar los requerimientos de información que apoyen el proceso de toma de decisiones para una empresa de tamaño mediano del rubro maderero.El procedimiento se basa en los principios de la Metodología Multicriterio de Apoyo a la Decisión-Constructivista para capturar, desde los involucrados con el proceso de mantenimiento, la falta de información, ordenarla y jerarquizarla y de los principios de la Teoría de Sistemas para definir las funciones y los grupos de información.Como un resultado anexo de la aplicación de este procedimiento se obtuvieron las bases para un sistema administrativo.Esto se logra al definir la malla de información, los procedimientos para ejecutar cada función y la estructura de datos para cada grupo de información.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0718-07642015000600009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Ashraf W. Labib. A decision analysis model for maintenance policy delection using a CMMS. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. Vol. 10 No. 3, 191-202, (2004)
  2. De Moraes L., Garcia R., Ensslin L., Da Conceição M. The multicriteria analysis for construction of benchmarkers to support the Clinical Engineering in the Healthcare Technology Management. European Journal of Operational Research 200, 607-615, (2010)
  3. Ehsani M., Makui A., Nezhad S.S. A methodology for analyzing decision networks, based on information theory. European Journal of Operational Research 202, 853-863, (2010)
  4. Espinosa F., Salinas G. Selección de Estrategias de Mejoramiento de las Condiciones de Trabajo para la Función Mantenimiento Utilizando la Metodología MCDA Constructivista. Inf. Tecnol. 24(3), 57-72, (2013)
  5. Gento A. Decision rules for a maintenance database. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. Volume 10, Number 3, 210-220, (2004)
  6. Hites R., De Smet Y., Risse N., Salazar-Neumann M., Vincke P. About the applicability of MCDA to some robustness problems. European Journal of Operational Research Volume 174, Issue 1, 1, 322-332, (2006)
  7. Kadzinski M., Greco S., Słowinski R. Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria ranking and choice. European Journal of Operational Research 217, 541-553, (2012)
  8. M.R. Rotab Khan and Ibrahim A. Darrab. Development of analytical relation between maintenance, quality and productivity. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. Vol. 16 No. 4, 341-353, (2010)
  9. Ramin Karim, Olov Candell, Peter Söderholm. E-maintenance and information logistics: aspects of content format. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 15 No. 3, 308-324, (2009)
  10. Sherwin, David. Software reliability modeling in distributed development environment. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Vol.6, Nº 3, 138-164, (2000)
  11. Tsang, A.H.C. Strategic dimensions of maintenance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 1, 7-39, (2002)
  12. Al-Turki. A framework for strategic planning in maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Vol. 17 No. 2, 150-162, (2011)
  13. Vasconcelos A., The role of professional discourses in the organizational adaptation of information systems. International Journal of Information Management 27, 279-293, (2007)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Espinosa, F. F., & Salinas, G. E.
Affiliations
Universidad de Talca (CL)
ORCID
Espinosa, Fernando F
Venue
Información tecnológica
Publisher
SciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID)
Published
2015
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
65-76
ISSN
  • 0716-8756 (ISSN-L)
  • 0718-0764
DOI
10.4067/s0718-07642015000600009
OpenAlex
W2257046319
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Información tecnológica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
maintenance management, information needs, decision support, systems theory, information hierarchy, information grid, administrative information systems, timber industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Definición de los Requerimientos de Información y Funciones para la Gestión de Mantenimiento Mediante un Proceso de Análisis Constructivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4067/s0718-07642015000600009
The paper
Espinosa, F. F., & Salinas, G. E. (2015). Definición de los Requerimientos de Información y Funciones para la Gestión de Mantenimiento Mediante un Proceso de Análisis Constructivo. Información tecnológica. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07642015000600009