Cited by 19Genetic and Environmental Crop StudiesCrop Yield and Soil FertilityAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Seeding Rate and Cultivar Impacts on Nutrient Uptake of Field Pea under Fertile Soil Condition

Open access
Asik, Baris Bülent, Uzun, Aysen, Acikgöz, Esvet·2020·Chilean journal of agricultural research

Abstract

Plant density is an important agronomic factor that affects crop growth, development, and yield.The optimum plant density to attain the highest yield can vary with genotype, production and, environmental factors.A field experiment was conducted at Bursa Uludag University Agricultural Area to evaluate the effects of seeding rate and variety on plant nutrient uptake of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars (Ulubatli, Kirazli, Golyazi, and Urunlu).Some very important factors responsible for low yield are plant density under field conditions and the selection of unsuitable cultivars.The adoption of pea cultivars that are more productive and better adapted to cultivation regions and the increase in plant population per area are important strategies to obtain higher productivity under field conditions.Plant density is one of the most effective agronomic factors for determining optimum plant nutrient uptake.The factorial experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design with three replicates per treatment.Four cultivars and five seeding rates (75, 100, 125, 150, and 175 g seed m -2 ) were evaluated.Results showed that plant nutrient uptake was affected by seeding rate and pea cultivars.The maximum rate of plant nutrient uptake occurred at a density of 100-125 g seed m -2 and for 'Kirazli', 'Golyazi', and 'Urunlu'.However, 'Ulubatli' showed minimum values of nutrient uptake.Regarding macroand micronutrients, varieties on the average had mean nutrient uptake with the following sequence: N > K > Ca > P > Mg, Na, Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu.Pea varieties and seeding rates should be considered in the fertilization program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0718-58392020000100011

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher seed densities can lead to increased competition for limited resources, resulting in reduced seedling growth and greater variability in germination outcomes.

    “Some studies [32,33] have shown that higher seed densities can lead to increased competition for limited resources, resulting in reduced seedling growth and greater variability in germination outcomes.”

    From Optimizing Water, Temperature, and Density Conditions for In Vitro Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Germination (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Introduction states that competition for water, light, and nutrients increases with planting density and that plant growth tends to decrease. The Results and Discussion also report reduced shoot and branch numbers at higher seeding rates. The paper does not establish reduced seedling growth specifically or greater variability in germination outcomes; a search for germination, seedling emergence, and variability found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Adhikari, T., Sarkar, D., Mashayekhi, H., and Xing, B. 2016. Growth and enzymatic activity of maize (Zea mays L.) plant: Solution culture test for copper dioxide nano particles. Journal of Plant Nutrition 39(1):99-115.
  2. Clayton, G., Rice, W., Blade, S., Grant, C., Harker, N., Johnston, A., et al. 1998. Minimizing risk and increasing yield stability in field pea production. In Proceedings from the 10 th Annual Meeting, Conference and Trade Show of the Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association, Regina. 11-12 February. Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  3. Lafond, J., and Pageau, D. 2010. Phosphorus and potassium fertilization of dry pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 90(5):629-636.
  4. McDonald, G.K., Hollaway, K.L., and McMurray, L. 2007. Increasing plant density improves weed competition in lentils (Lens culinaris). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47:48-56.
  5. Olle, M. 2017. The effect of sowing rate and variety on the yield, protein content and height of field pea. International Journal of Food and Biosystems Engineering 3(1):11-18.
  6. Özsoy, G., and Aksoy, E. 2007. Characterization, classification and agricultural usage of vertisols developed on neogen aged calcareous marl parent materials. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 1(1):5-10.
  7. Semere, T., and Froud-Williams, R.J. 2001. The effect of pea cultivar and water stress on root and shoot competition between vegetative plants of maize and peas. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:137-145.
  8. Uzun, A., Asik, B.B., and Acikgöz, E. 2017. Effects of different seeding rates on forage yield and quality components in pea. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 22(1):126-133.
  9. Wang, N., and Daun, J.K. 2004. Effect of variety and crude protein content on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84:1021-1029.
  10. Yoshida, H., Tomiyama, Y., Tanaka, M., and Mizushina, Y. 2007. Characteristic profiles of lipid classes, fatty acids and triacylglycerol molecular species of peas (Pisum sativum L.) European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109:600-607.
  11. Zandi, P., Shirani-Rad, A.H., and Bazrkar-Khatibani, L. 2011. Agronomic study of fenugreek grown under different in- row spacing and nitrogen levels in a paddy field of Iran. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 10:544-550.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asik, B. B., Uzun, A., & Acikgöz, E.
Venue
Chilean journal of agricultural research
Published
2020-03
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
11-20
ISSN
  • 0718-5820 (ISSN-L)
  • 0718-5839
OpenAlex
W3008788208
Cited by
19
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Chilean journal of agricultural research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
field pea, Pisum sativum, seeding rate, plant density, cultivar effects, nutrient uptake, macro and micronutrients, cultivar selection, fertilization program, fertile soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review