The replacement child syndrome following stillbirth: a reconsideration
Abstract
Résumé Cet article réexamine le syndrome de l’« enfant de remplacement » suivant la naissance d’un enfant mort-né, en considérant une perspective plus contemporaine sur le deuil, notamment la notion de « continuité du lien », qui suppose la construction d’une relation modifiée avec le bébé défunt. De récentes études qualitatives ont examiné attentivement des histoires de mères et suggèrent la présence d’une relation continue avec leur bébé décédé, d’une manière non-pathologique. Ces études suggèrent que cette nouvelle relation peut contribuer à un enrichissement de l’expérience parentale de ces mères. Cependant, ce domaine émergent de la recherche nécessite des investigations supplémentaires afin de comprendre les facteurs susceptibles d’affecter la relation de la mère avec l’enfant né après.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some siblings may feel they were born to replace the sibling who died.
“Some may feel they were born to replace the sibling who died (Ünstündag‐Budak 2015).”
From Support for parents and families after stillbirth and neonatal death (2024) · cites this paper as Ünstündag‐Budak 2015
Cites
Campbell-Jackson, L., Bezance, J., & Horsch, A. (2014) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-014-0423-x · Cited by 96 · see citing works
The psychological impact of stillbirth on women: a systematic review
Campbell-Jackson, L., & Horsch, A. (2014) · Illness, Crisis & Loss · doi:10.2190/il.22.3.d · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Macfie, J., Fitzpatrick, K. L., Rivas, E. M., & Cox, M. J. (2008) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616730701868589 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Relation between grief and subsequent pregnancy status 13 months after perinatal bereavement
Barr, P. (2006) · jpme · doi:10.1515/jpm.2006.036 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Support for parents and families after stillbirth and neonatal death
Loughnan, S., Bakhbakhi, D., Ellwood, D. A., Boyle, F., Middleton, P., Burden, C., Ludski, K., Saunders, R., & Flenady, V. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015798 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ünstündag-Budak, A. M.
- Venue
- Enfance
- Publisher
- CAIRN
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 351-364
- ISSN
- 0013-7545 (ISSN-L)
- 1969-6981
- OpenAlex
- W2216216197
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Enfance (publishedVersion)
- Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Keywords
- stillbirth, grief, mother-infant relationship, bereavement, postpartum experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review