Cited by 29Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Relation between grief and subsequent pregnancy status 13 months after perinatal bereavement

Barr, Peter·2006·jpme

Abstract

Aims: The present longitudinal study sought to explore the relationship between parental grief following perinatal bereavement and subsequent pregnancy, according to the particular facets of grief and pregnancy state being considered. Method: The study participants were 63 couples who had been bereaved by stillbirth (n=31) or neonatal death (n=32). The relationship of self-reported grief (Perinatal Grief Scale-33 Active Grief, Difficulty Coping and Despair) 1 month and 13 months after the loss to subsequent pregnancy status (Pregnant, n=20, Live Baby, n=10, Trying, n=11, Not Trying, n=22) at 13 months was investigated with repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: There were statistically significant main effects for Active Grief and Difficulty Coping in women and men and Despair in women, but not in men. There was a statistically significant Active Grief by pregnancy status interaction in women (F(3, 59)=2.89, P=0.04), but not in men. Simple main effects analysis indicated a statistically significant decrease in Active Grief in women who were pregnant (F(1, 59)=52.8, P<0.0005), women who were not pregnant and not trying to conceive (F(1, 59)=27.5, P<0.0005), and women who had had a live baby (F(1, 59)=9.62, P=0.003). There was no statistically significant decrease in Active Grief in women who were not pregnant but trying to conceive (F(1, 59)=3.44, P=0.07). The Difficulty Coping in women and men and Despair in women by pregnancy status interactions were not statistically significant. None of the between-subjects main effects for pregnancy status was statistically significant in women or men. Conclusion: The relation between grief and subsequent pregnancy differed with the sex of the parent and the particular facets of grief and pregnancy state being considered. Subsequent pregnancy was related to Active Grief in women, but not to Difficulty Coping or Despair that are known to be predictors of chronic grief.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jpm.2006.036

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barr, P.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU)
Corresponding author
Barr, Peter
Venue
jpme
Published
2006-04-07
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
207-211
ISSN
  • 0300-5577 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-3997
OpenAlex
W1967955774
Cited by
29
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Perinatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
perinatal bereavement, parental grief, subsequent pregnancy, stillbirth, neonatal death, despair, sex differences, chronic grief, Perinatal Grief Scale
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Female, Grief, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Pregnancy, Time Factors, Pregnancy Rate, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review