CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Seasonal Nutrient Dynamics and Biomass Quality of Giant Reed (Arundo Donax L.) and Miscanthus (Miscanthus x Giganteus Greef et Deuter) as Energy Crops

Nassi o Di Nasso, Nicoletta, Roncucci, Neri, Triana, Federico, Tozzini, Cristiano, Bonari, Enrico·2011·Italian Journal of Agronomy
DOI 10.4081/ija.2011.e24
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4081/ija.2011.e24

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Meteorological data during the 2009 growing season in comparison with the long-term average (1986-2008) at the field experimental site (Pisa, Italy, 43°40' N, 10°19' E).
Figure 1 Meteorological data during the 2009 growing season in comparison with the long-term average (1986-2008) at the field experimental site (Pisa, Italy, 43°40' N, 10°19' E).CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 3 Seasonal variation (2009) in N (A), P (B) and K (C) concentrations of giant reed and miscanthus in Pisa, Italy (43°40' N, 10°19' E). ○ , giant reed; ● , miscanthus; bars represent the standard deviation; *, **, ***, significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively; ns, no significant differences.
Figure 3 Seasonal variation (2009) in N (A), P (B) and K (C) concentrations of giant reed and miscanthus in Pisa, Italy (43°40' N, 10°19' E). ○ , giant reed; ● , miscanthus; bars represent the standard deviation; *, **, ***, significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively; ns, no significant differences.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 4 Seasonal variation (2009) in N (A), P (B) and K (C) contents of giant reed and miscanthus in Pisa, Italy (43°40' N, 10°19' E). ○ , giant reed; ● , miscanthus; bars represent the standard deviation; *, **, ***, significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively; ns, no significant differences.
Figure 4 Seasonal variation (2009) in N (A), P (B) and K (C) contents of giant reed and miscanthus in Pisa, Italy (43°40' N, 10°19' E). ○ , giant reed; ● , miscanthus; bars represent the standard deviation; *, **, ***, significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively; ns, no significant differences.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Figure 5 Seasonal variation (2009) in cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin content of giant reed and miscanthus in Pisa, Italy (43°40' N, 10°19' E). ○ , giant reed; ● , miscanthus; bars represent the standard deviation; *, **, ***, significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively; ns, no significant differences.
Figure 5 Seasonal variation (2009) in cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin content of giant reed and miscanthus in Pisa, Italy (43°40' N, 10°19' E). ○ , giant reed; ● , miscanthus; bars represent the standard deviation; *, **, ***, significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively; ns, no significant differences.CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Angelini, 2005, Biomass yield and energy balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) cropped in central Italy as related to different management practices, Eur. J. Agron, 22, 375, 10.1016/j.eja.2004.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Beale, 1997, Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4-grasses Miscanthus x giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides, Biomass Bioener, 12, 419, 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00016-0 · DOI
  3. Cherubini, 2010, LCA of a biorefinery concept producing bioethanol, bioenergy, and chemicals from switchgrass, Int. J. Life Cycle Ass, 15, 53, 10.1007/s11367-009-0124-2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Christian, 2008, Growth, yield and mineral content of Miscanthus x giganteus grown as a biofuel for 14 successive harvests, Ind. Crops Prod, 28, 320, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cosentino, 2007, Effects of soil water content and nitrogen supply on the productivity of Miscanthus x giganteus Greef et Deu in a Mediterranean environment, Ind. Crops Prod, 25, 75, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.07.006 · DOI
  6. Heaton, 2009, Seasonal dynamics of Miscanthus x giganteus and Panicum virgatum, GCB Bioener, 1, 297, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01022.x · DOI
  7. Himken, 1997, Cultivation of Miscanthus under west European conditions: seasonal changes in dry matter production, nutrient uptake and remobilization, Plant Soil, 189, 117, 10.1023/A:1004244614537 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jørgensen, 2000, Wheat rye and triticale for energy – input, yield and quality, Do Energy Crops have a Future in Denmark? DJF rapport Markbrug, 29, 6
  9. Jørgensen, 1997, Perennial crops for fibre and energy use as a tool for fulfilling the Danish strategies on improving surface and ground water quality, Alternative Use of Agricultural Land. SP Report, 18, 12
  10. Kahle, 2001, Cropping of Miscanthus in Central Europe: biomass production and influence on nutrients and soil organic matter, Eur. J. Agron, 15, 171, 10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00102-2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Keshwani, 2009, Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added applications: A review, Bioresource Technol, 100, 1523, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.035 · DOI
  12. Lodhiyal, 1997, Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency in short rotation, high density central Himalayan Tarai poplar plantations, Ann. Bot, 79, 517, 10.1006/anbo/79.5.517 · DOI
  13. Long, 1983, C4 photosynthesis at low temperatures, Plant Cell Environ, 6, 345, 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11612141 · DOI
  14. Nassi o Di Nasso, 2009, Improving energy crop cultivation in the Mediterranean region: nutrient content, uptake and nutrient use efficiency in giant reed (Arundo donax L.), Proc. 16th Nitrogen Workshop – Connecting Different Scales of Nitrogen Use in Agriculture, Turin, Italy, 321
  15. Nassi o Di Nasso, 2009, Influenza dell’epoca di raccolta sulla resa e sulla composizione della biomassa di canna comune (Arundo donax L.) in Italia Centrale, Atti XXXVIII Convegno Nazionale della Società Italiana di Agronomia (SIA), Firenze, Italy, 141
  16. Nassi, 2010, Influence of fertilisation and harvest time on fuel quality of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in Central Italy, Eur. J. Agron, 32, 219, 10.1016/j.eja.2009.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Neto, 1997, Variations in chemical composition and structure of macromolecular components in different morphological regions and maturity stages of Arundo donax, Ind. Crops Prod, 6, 51, 10.1016/S0926-6690(96)00205-1 · DOI
  18. Öhgren, 2006, Fuel ethanol production from steam-pretreated corn stover using SSF at higher dry matter content, Biomass Bioener, 30, 863, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.02.002 · DOI
  19. Rowe, 2009, Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 13, 271, 10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Scordia, 2009, Production of second generation bioethanol from giant reed (Arundo donax L.), in Proc. 17th Eur. Biomass Conf. and Exibition, Hamburg, Germany, pp 1494
  21. Sharma, 1999, Nutrient dynamics in an Arundo donax wetland: nutrient uptake, seasonal changes in tissue concentration and release during in situ decomposition, Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci, 25, 1
  22. Shatalov, 2002, Influence of stem morphology on pulp and paper properties of Arundo donax L. reed, Ind. Crop Prod., 15, 77, 10.1016/S0926-6690(01)00098-X · DOI
  23. Smith, 2010, The effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer applications to Miscanthus x giganteus, Arundo donax and Phalaris arundinacea, when grown as energy crops in Wales, UK, Global Change Biol. Bioener, 2, 169, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01051.x · DOI
  24. Smith, 2011, Mobilization of minerals and moisture loss during senescence of the energy crops Miscanthus x giganteus, Arundo donax and Phalaris arundinacea, in Wales, UK, Global Change Biol. Bioener, 3, 148, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01069.x · DOI
  25. Sun, 2002, Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review, Bioresource Technol, 83, 1, 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00212-7 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Van Soest, 1991, Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition, J. Dairy Sci, 74, 3583, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Zub, 2010, Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev, 30, 201, 10.1051/agro/2009034 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Nassi o Di Nasso, N., Roncucci, N., Triana, F., Tozzini, C., & Bonari, E.
Venue
Italian Journal of Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
e24
ISSN
1125-4718
DOI
10.4081/ija.2011.e24
Cited by
34
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review